[SOC] May CQ

[Rob Matherly]

Did any of the CQ subscribers around here catch this month's zero bias
column and read that glowing editorial on why we should latch on to a
proposal to move 40 down because "it would be great for ham radio"?

Here's the best tidbit: "Some of us might be squeezed out of any 'new'
frequencies below 7 MHz until we buy new radios."  Sure, maybe he's got a
big enough piggy bank laying around to buy a new rig but I sure don't.

I gotta disagree with him when he says it's "an acceptable compromise", and
especially when he says it'll make 40 a better place to operate.  Sure
there'll be less QRM... people with boatanchors will be left out in the
cold!

72/73/oo
Rob, W�JRM
ARRL; FP Qrp -330; Live-Wire #442; IA QRP #143; SOC #497; QRPp-I #19

Visit my website! http://www.qsl.net/w0jrm

AIM - w0jrm, jimrob4 ---  MSN - jimrob@jetnetinc.net
Y! - kc0bom --- ICQ - 114690148

"And by good night I mean shut up"