[SixClub] Reply from John K8OCL

[bruce mallon]

They are not using a CW/voice ID.

 I e-mailed the guy with a license and he seems
willing to work with us but being out in the far west
doesn't here all the rest of us many running low
power.

Bottom line they did not want this swarm of bees which
they now have to contend with. It's my belief that all
this hush-hush behind close doors ARRL stuff boils
down to they were going to get this passed and then BY
LAW we would have to accept it.

The DIGI guys now have 220 for there mode and its a
done deal with the FCC  still they are not happy. 

The ARRL has shown that it cannot be relied on and we
need to watch them and the DIGI groups of the future.
If we let our guard down this will happen again and no
doubt they are planning it as I write.

Sad that it has come to this .......

--- Gabriel Sierra <g_moonrec at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello gang,
> 
> This is John's response to my letter:
> 
> "Gabriel,
> 
> Thanks for your input.
> 
> 73,
> John - K8OCL"
> 
> His e-mail is K8OCL at hotmail.com
> 
> Our user base on 6 meter is a big but normally quiet
> one, so we are exposed, now that the BW have been
> limited on the other bands, to this kind of
> situations. Only us can prevent this from happening
> again, by swarming like a disrupted fire ants' nest
> when this things happen. We need to take this
> experience, and learn from it. Does anybody has an
> MP3
> file of how this signals sound? It could simplify
> making heads or tails of this kind of interference.
> Keep your ears open, and report to this and other 6M
> groups. Remember, no ID, no HAM.
> 
> Take care everyone, 73

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com