[SFDXA] DQRM

[Norm Alexander]

It has become a world wide plague, seems that the more rare the DX the more severe the DQRM. It also brings out the more incompetent operators.  I believe it is just a continuation of the general deterioration of the social fabric, lack of respect and the "must have it now" attitude of so many people - every where!   What to do about it? Not sure, however when hams begin full digital transmission schemes it may render QRM in effective as error correction could prevail.  Viva La Technology!
 


      From: Bill <bmarx at bellsouth.net>
 To: LaVant Morell <k4lm at comcast.net>; sfdxa <SFDXA at mailman.qth.net> 
 Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [SFDXA] DQRM
   
I agree...I had to abandon a chase last night for the same reason...
Bill W2CQ


On 4/7/2016 12:12 PM, LaVant Morell wrote:
> Just worked 5V7D on 17m.  Intentional QRMer with a solid carrier is on 
> his freq.  He is lucky that I don't know who he is.  I cannot 
> understand what pleasure these guys get out of doing this.  Most of 
> the time the DX is louder than them anyway. It is just very annoying.
>
> Vant K4LM