[ScanIndiana] Mobile scanner

[Ken Bandy]

OK, I guess I mis-understood your reply.  I have both a 296 and a PRO-96.
While the PRO-96 does seem to have better audio decoding quality, they both
have their place, I guess.  Of course, I don't have any 9600 baud systems
around, either.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: scanindiana-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:scanindiana-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Randy True
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:16 AM
To: Indiana Scanning
Cc: 'Indiana Scanning'
Subject: Re: [ScanIndiana] Mobile scanner


I didn't say the 796 wouldn't do 9600bd.
I have both the 796 and a Pro 96, and the 96, which is what the 2096
basicaly is, does a better job with the 9600bd systems.
IMHO.

Randy


On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:47:58 -0500, you wrote:

>Actually, either the Uniden BC796D or the Radio Shack 2096 will do 9600
baud
>systems.  It's the Uniden 785D that only does 3600 baud.
>
>Ken
>KC9GLQ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: scanindiana-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>[mailto:scanindiana-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Randy True
>Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:13 PM
>To: Indiana Scanning
>Cc: 'Indiana Scanning'
>Subject: Re: [ScanIndiana] Mobile scanner
>
>
>You only have two choices.
>Uniden's BC796 and the Radio Shack Pro 2096.
>If you don't have any 9600bd systems, the Uniden will do fine.
>If you have 9600bd systems, go for the Radio Shack.

-\|/-
Randy True KD4YKV
Ryland Heights, KY
Ten-Tec RX350, Kenwood R5000, Icom R8500 and a T2FD