[Scan-DC] Military plane crashes in Augusta County, Virginia...more

Sean Hoyden sean.hoyden at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 15:29:41 EDT 2014


One of the problems in "interoperability" isn't the technical feasibility
as much as it is the leadership and accountability to use it.  As is the
case in many of these situations, it is a gaggle of different agencies
responding, all with their own procedures and predispositions about who
they work for.

I've arrived on scenes where multiple agencies are responding several
times, only to find out that the scene commander (if there even is one) has
not held a planning brief with section leaders and chiefs to work out a
quick comm plan.  Worse yet, many state and local agencies don't even HAVE
an inter-agency comm procedure to know which radio or channels they should
be monitoring.

Most scene commanders will tell you, "In an emergency, I don't have time to
deal with those problems, I have to coordinate a response!"  Well chief,
how exactly do you coordinate a response if all of your responders are not
working from the same playbook, or the same communications channel?

To make matters worse, your responders often don't know how to use the
equipment they have.  I've worked with VSP, Fairfax County PD, DHS, and
even FBI guys that don't know anything about their radios beyond the
O-N-O-F-F Discriminator Switch and the volume knob.  They start their shift
by turning the radio on, and leaving it on, if their MDT doesn't tell them
where to go and when, they'd probably sit in the parking lot at the
precinct for their entire shift.  I'm not generalizing ALL law enforcement
people here, not by a long shot, but one has to be careful how easily they
assign technical competency to everyone just because they made it through
their respective service academy and put a uniform on.

I helped with an exercise 2 years ago which dealt with a simulated
terrorist attack, I won't name names or agencies, but one officer I spoke
with during the exercise openly admitted that he had no idea how to do
anything with his radio that would set up the talk groups for all the other
agencies.  His rationale?  "I'll never have to use it anyways."

That all being said, I'd be surprised if the pilot was armed at all.  Hell,
even aircrews over in the Persian Gulf have been known to fly without their
sidearms.  I just talked to a guy yesterday who used to fly A-10's, and he
said that he regularly flew into Iraq and Afghanistan without his pistol.
He figured that if he was going to go down in his flying tank, he was going
to be dead before he hit the ground or he was going to fly the plane into
the bad guys.  So on a ferry mission stateside, I'd be surprised if the
pilot didn't see having a pistol with him as just another piece of crap to
share the cockpit with.

Sean



On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:30 PM, John Wilson <w4uvv at comcast.net> wrote:

> Once again I guess I am the skunk at the picnic but here are my comments
> about yesterday's comms I heard and more importantly those that never
> happened.  I am retired where everyday is a holiday.  I have 6 tower
> mounted mast mounted preamped Scantennas at about 115 ft.  I hear a lot.  I
> have a PSR 600, 3 996XTs, 1 396XT and several R7000s for analog reception.
> My STARS reception is Div 1, 3, and 5 unless I use my DMR computer/radio
> system.  Then I can receive a few voice repeaters from Div 2..  Because the
> same STARS CC was assigned by the radio techs for both the Waverly and Fork
> Mtn., STARS sites my reception from Fork Mtn. are the voice repeaters
> programed for conventional reception.  I also can hear a couple of the Bear
> Den Mtn. voice repeaters.  The PSR600 and one 996XT are dedicated solely
> for STARS scanning reception, one 996XT for local and area scanning and one
> 996XT dedicated to scanning only federal the vhf/uhf ranges.
>
> As usual my comments and opinions are subject to error and correction.
> About 1000 yesterday I started hearing some Richmond VSP short cryptic type
> voice comms which VSP uses when they don't want to say anything more about
> a situation than necessary.  I concluded it was a possible airplane crash.
> Soon thereafter I heard "Legend 7 " wheels up from Mountain Empire AP which
> is a relatively short runway airport at Marion which is close to I81.  DMA
> comms always get my attention as the users I previously have heard are
> selected Army Reserve/National Guard and of late the Va. Defense Force
> units.  At first I thought it was a drill as there was not the sense of
> emergency heard like when a trooper is pursuing a suspect who bails and
> runs.  I concluded it was not a drill.  As best I could determine control
> was established at the Chesterfield Co. AP. Control was "DMA Control" and
> occasionally "Chesterfield Ops" was also heard on DMA talkgroup 4529
> talking to unknown DMA military person on scene at Deerfield, VA.
>
>  In my opinion DMA had little if any interoperability  comms with VSP or
> any other STARS user.  If it happened I never heard them which is possible
> depending on site affiliations originally programed by the STARS radio
> techs..  STARS VSP comms were VSP comms only and DMA comms were DMA comms
> only..
>
> Excuse me, but for STARS VSP Div 3 talkgroup 6138 "INOP PS3" "VSP MUTUAL
> AID PUBLIC SERVICE" could have been used IF the Dept. of Military Affairs
> radios had been programmed for such affiliation. Each STARS radio costs
> about $6,000 each.  There are 16 channels per zone operation.  Up to 32
> zones user switch selectable are available.  Zone 21 selection allows comms
> on VCALL on ch. 1 and VTACS 11-14 on channels 2-5.  Rarely are
> interoperability comms attempted on STARS.  Each STARS user is a "world to
> themselves".  I occasionally hear testing on a few interoperability
> talkgroups, but I heard nothing yesterday on any of the STARS
> interoperability talkgroups.   VSP for sure has the capability.  Once again
> these great expensive comm systems work fine on paper but maybe not always
> so great in reality.
>
> To be fair I was surprised at the relatively dependable STARS comms from
> the aircraft.  Many STARS sites are the old analog VSP sites many of which
> are on mountaintops such as the one on Bear Den Mtn. in Augusta Co., which
> was probably the one used most frequently. STARS radios, like cellphones,
> constantly search for the strongest site received signal.
>
> So all search aircraft could talk to each other using their vhf aviation
> radios on 123.0250 mhz. and the DMA a/c additionally on STARS only to other
> DMA aircraft and DMA Command.  In eastern Virginia all Medflight type
> radios are PRE_PROGRAMED for certain frequencies and not frequency
> changeable "on the fly".  That's why my county has to have an EMS ambulance
> on site to talk to Medflight on "statewide" as the fire engines cannot
> communication on 155.2050 mhz. "statewide".  That's also why when on scene
> Medflights request the ground POC to switch to 155.2050 mhz. "statewide"
> which every VFD and EMS licensed entity is required to have.
>
> STARS users include but are not limited to VSP, DMA,F&G, FORESTRY, VDEM,
> DC&R and DEQ.  These would be appropriate users for interoperability comms
> yesterday but I didn't hear a peep from any except VSP and DMA and maybe a
> F&G officer signing in/off duty..  S&R units in Virginia I have heard use
> 155.2050 mhz. base/mobile simplex or sometimes portables only.
>
> In that mountainous terrain a mountaintop repeater such as the Forestry
> Service uses for forest fire comms are required.  We ham operators know the
> joy and thrill of vhf/uhf mountaintop simplex and/or repeater comms and
> also know what happens when we drop down on the side to the bottom of a
> mountain.  Checking my Virginia frequency database I see numerous VFD's and
> EMS and law enforcement but no county EOC.  Looks like Augusta Co. needs
> one.  If any circumstance required interoperability comms it was yesterday.
> Looks like a few organizational "Lessons Learned" meetings will occur after
> the happenings yesterday.
>
>  The VSP mobile comm vehicle mentioned sounds like one of the VSP's
> divisions' mobile 800 mhz. frequency cell type repeater.  They typically
> are used at car races and the state fair for on site comms and not using
> the STARS system..  A mobile unit is assigned to each VSP division.
>
> The "limited' cellphone reception posted was a direct quote from the DMA
> a/c helicopter on scene at Deerfield early yesterday morning.
>
> Searching continues today.  One or more aircraft continue searching while
> other aircraft fly Shenandoah airport for refueling.  From what little I
> heard from different sources was the pilot was flying to New Orleans to
> have his a/c radar updated.  He was flying at 43,000 ft. and supposedly
> ejected at 1,800 ft.  Ejection basically involves sitting on top of an
> artillery shell going from zero to over 200 miles an hour in a few
> seconds.  The plane appeared to impact almost vertically and depending at
> what altitude he ejected he could be a significant distance from the crash
> site.  He may have a few flares, survival pistol, mirror, and I thought a
> portable on 243 mhz.  I don't know whether the military has converted to
> the 400 mhz. frequency or not.   If he was injured and is below the tree
> line it will be very difficult to find him from the air.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Bruce Harper wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, John Wilson wrote:
>>
>>  Limited cellphone and STARS coverage in the mountainous search area.
>>>
>> "Limited" doesn't begin to describe it -- "nonexistent" is a better
>> description. The Va. Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) put out
>> the call for search and rescue groups to send personnel to conduct the
>> ground search, which resulted in members from multiple groups arriving
>> at the Deerfield Volunteer Fire Department. There were about 10 of us
>> from the Southwest Virginia Mountain Rescue Group (SWVaMRG). I arrived
>> on the scene about 6 p.m. and we finally headed out on a task around
>> 8:30 p.m. There were seven helicopters there conducting air searches
>> -- 1 VSP, 1 U.S. Customs, 1 unmarked (but folks who ran the tail
>> number got a return to U.S. Governement -- comments were that it was
>> either the FBI HRT or Homeland Security), plus a variety of military
>> copters. Since I'm near the bottom of the chain, there isn't much more
>> that I know. The search was a joint operation being run by the
>> military (don't know if VA National Guard, U.S., or who), the Virginia
>> State Police, and VDEM (since that is where the SAR expertise is). Our
>> comms were handled by a trooper on our search team, who was working on
>> Appomatox channels. The state radio cache was brought in (from
>> Harrisonburg, I heard someone say) but I don't know if those were
>> being distributed. There was one mast antenna erected, but I don't
>> know if it was for ground comms or air comms. Between the troopers and
>> SAR personnel, there were at least 100 people involved (mainly waiting
>> around until search areas were narrowed down), along with a couple of
>> FBI agents (called in from Charlottesville mainly to provide
>> manpower), various military types, plus support personnel from the
>> various agencies and the local volunteer fire and rescue folks. There
>> were also equine searchers in the mix. Corrine Geller from VSP was the
>> PIO for the operation. There were some young people from the Civil Air
>> Patrol there when I bailed around midnight. Search  operations were
>> suspended at midnight and were starting up again at 8 this morning
>> (but after hitting the bed at 3:30, I wasn't about to get up a 5:30
>> for a 6 a.m. departure).
>>
>> Bruce in Blacksburg
>>
>> Bruce Harper
>> Search Team Member
>> Southwest Virginia Mountain Rescue Group
>> http://swvamrg.blacksburgrescue.org/
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Scan-DC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>



-- 




Sean Hoyden
703.899.8893

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -- Benjamin Franklin

-- Want to see my nighttime railroad photography?  Just check out My FLICKR
page <https://www.flickr.com/photos/23954134@N06/>, while my new website is
under rebuild after a hacker strike.


More information about the Scan-DC mailing list