[Scan-DC] 162.0600 mhz. user?

[David Jones]

It is the Security Service as reported in a previous e-mail.  These units 
patrol not only the main facility but other smaller facilities in the 
northern Virginia area.  The split refered to could be one of several 
highway splits in the area that are proximate to the facilities.  Could be 
267/66/495 or GWMP/495.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clegg, Andrew W." <aclegg at nsf.gov>
To: "SPRS" <hsimpson1 at lycos.com>; <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] 162.0600 mhz. user?


> I've been recording the activity last evening and overnight. My 
> observations so far:
>
> 1) I have not noticed encrypted transmissions. Seems to all be in the 
> clear. Although maybe my HomePatrol just ignores the encrypted 
> transmissions so I don't even know they're there?
>
> 2) It's clearly some type of law enforcement.
>
> 3) A lot of talk about "gates": Charlie gate, north gate, etc. Also 
> frequent reference to the "northeast" part of whatever they are 
> patrolling.
>
> 4) I captured a reference last night to one unit being near the "split for 
> Washington/495." I can't picture where such a split would be. If, by 
> chance, he meant "Washington/395," that could be Washington Blvd and 395, 
> and that is the general vicinity of Ft. Myer.
>
> 5) For a digital system, the copy is unusually clear and reliable from my 
> place in Arlington. Most digital systems, even Arlington's own, cut out a 
> lot (usually right at the most interesting point of the transmission).
>
> 6) As mentioned previously, the NAC is F.
>
> I'll keep listening.
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of SPRS
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:12 AM
> To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] 162.0600 mhz. user?
>
> Any radio ID's?
>
>
>
> on Dec 13, 2012, David Jones <djoneses at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>I monitored today and it is not NPS.  Some is encrypted and some isn't --  
>>operator
>>error I believe.
>>
>>~Bill <ecps92 at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>162.0625 R $00F
>>>NPS in VA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html