[Scan-DC] (no subject)
Joel Kahn
jrkahn at att.net
Tue Nov 27 22:52:09 EST 2012
No, Dewey, That one was my fault. Andy was refering to my reply a few days ago,
where
Tom Thomas was asking about an AA dispatcher requesting some units to bring in
their radios for reprogramming, and I supposed that they had not been rebanded
yet.
I thought that AA County did reband? maybe I am wrong....again.! I know Howard
did, but I don't listen to either of them with any regularity.
I think you are probably correct that they needed an encryption key added to
their channels.
Joel
________________________________
From: Dewey3 <dewey3 at gmail.com>
To: Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tue, November 27, 2012 11:04:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] (no subject)
Actually, the "Debbie Downer" statement makes perfect sense to me, and
gives me the "I think I know what's hapenning" feeling. Your average PD is
PD, and those with "radio knowledge" have it because the desire to know it
is already there, such as, a hobbiest who becomes a member of the PD (how I
started). When MPDC went to simplex surveillance channels on the Motorola
MXs after leaving the GE PEs in the late '70s and early '80s, something
around 98% of the department didn't realize what was happening. Instead,
they just assumed that **no one** could listen in on the surveillance
channels with a scanner. Applying that knowledge to your "Debbie Downer"
statement makes me think that "Rebanding" is now the "Word of the Month"
among a lot of PD personnel, and anytime a radio is being **reprogrammed**,
such as, simplying adding encryption to existing channels, a lot of members
are probably calling it "Rebanding".
Just my two cents for the day,
Dewey
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Clegg, Andrew W. <aclegg at nsf.gov> wrote:
> Here's my semi-regular "Debbie Downer" contribution: I don't think it will
> be too long before most or virtually all public safety communications goes
> digital and encrypted. Beyond that, if/when the nationwide FirstNet LTE
> network gets launched, the effect will be the same: We will no longer be
> able to listen. I'm thinking it's time to sell my scanners while they still
> have a modicum of value (as I wish I had done with my film cameras).
>
> Andy
______________________________________________________________
Scan-DC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Scan-DC
mailing list