[Scan-DC] PRO-106, PRO-197 Programming

Lepine, Paul lepine15 at comcast.net
Thu Jan 29 21:06:36 EST 2009


All,

I currently have two separate TSYS's in one scanlist....one is a digital 
trunk, the other is an 800mhz conventional trunk.  It works just fine.  The 
radio doesn't seem to care where an object is outputted to...the TSYS is an 
object unto itself, therefore, it can reside in one list, or all twenty, 
just like a conventional frequency.  A scanlist is just that, a list of 
objects that have been grouped in one location.  Hope this helps.

Paul


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Kitchener" <oldsdoug at hotmail.com>
To: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] PRO-106, PRO-197 Programming




Me either!  Didn't want to give it away, but what I'm really wondering is; 
there _is_ a limit of 20 "scan lists", and every "scannable object", whether 
it's a talkgroup or a conventional channel, has to be linked to a scan list. 
If I program in 20 trunked systems, and use a different scan list for each, 
what happens when I put in a 21st trunked system?   Will the radio know that 
these talkgroups go with the frequencies for this trunking system, and those 
talkgroups go with the frequencies for that system?  See what I mean?

(Thinking about it...) To put it yet another way, how are the talkgroups 
linked to the TSYSs... is it through the scanlists?  If so, then you're 
limited to 20 trunking systems.  But if they're linked through the _name_ of 
the trunking system, _then_ the limiting factor becomes the memory usage... 
right?  Wrong?

I guess I'll have to try programming two trunking systems into a single 
scanlist and test it... it could be that the link is through the name... 
will also have to join one of the yahoo groups or whatever, I guess!

----------------------------------------
> From: w4nng at soalex.us
> To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:47:19 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] PRO-106, PRO-197 Programming
>
> Not an expert but it appears there's only a limit on objects (as they are
> now called) If you used 95% of memory on conventional objects then you'd
> have room for a lot less TSYS objects then if you had no CONV objects.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Kitchener"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:11 PM
> Subject: [Scan-DC] PRO-106, PRO-197 Programming
>
>
>
> Well, I'm getting pretty comfortable with programming the new PRO-197, but
> here's a question for those who are familiar with it:
>
> How many trunked systems can be programmed into it? Or put it this way, is
> there a maximum or are you in some way limited to the number of trunked
> systems that can be programmed?
>
> (For 250,000 rupees, Jamal Malik, what is your final answer!?)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_012009
> _______________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Hotmail®…more than just e-mail.
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_012009
_______________________________________________
Scan-DC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net 



More information about the Scan-DC mailing list