[Scan-DC] re; 400 to 800 Mhz

[oldsdoug at hotmail.com]

Right!  That was my point, guys, it ain't the _towers_ that are 400 MHz!  It seemed (to me) a funny way to say it...


> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:39:15 -0800
> From: ka3jjz at netscape.com
> To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] re; 400 to 800 Mhz
>
> Probably a heckuva lot more than just that. Everything from site coverage surveys, new equipment (cavity filters, controllers, transmitters, new links) - man the list is huge. It's going to be a lot of work, for sure.
>
> '400 Mhz tower' is undoubtedly a little uneducated hyperbole on the part of the writer. For a pub that's
> read by the general public, it's probably as accurate as you can get in a general sense. But for those that
> will be involved, probably causes a few chuckles....73s Mike
>
> links editor,Capitol Hill Monitors
> Utility Monitoring Central
> editor, Strong Signals software page
> Wiki Administrator, Radioreference.Com
>
> --- hsgorden at comcast.net wrote:
>
>
>
> Change the coax and antenna!!!
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
> _______________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc

_________________________________________________________________
Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us