[Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments

[Doug K.]

Thanks Ed, I had been wondering if some of the secondary usages might 
change... will keep the "secret decoder chart" handy for the first little 
while until I get familiar with whatever changes they implement.

Regards,

Doug

"0940, WPVA-690 and WPVK-244!" (in "Martin Best" voiice!)


>From: "Ed Tobias" <edtobias at comcast.net>
>To: "Doug K." <oldsdoug at hotmail.com>,<scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>CC: <coxs_emoc at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:33:04 -0400
>
>Doug:
>
>I think that's mostly right.  However, I think you'll find that different 
>talk groups will be used for some working incidents.  For example, if 7-G 
>is already being used a second working incident now usually goes to 7-K.  
>It looks as if down the road the second incident will go to 71-C or 71-G, 
>which you now have named as 8-C and 8-G.
>
>Ed
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug K." <oldsdoug at hotmail.com>
>To: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>Cc: <coxs_emoc at yahoo.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>
>
>>Ed and all,
>>
>>Ref the Montgomery Fire radios, the way I understand this, it affects only 
>>the radios in the fire apparatus, correct?  IE, no talkgroups are being 
>>changed or reassigned or whatever, so this migration won't affect those of 
>>us with digital trunking scanners - is that right?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Doug
>>
>>
>>>From: "Ed Tobias" <edtobias at comcast.net>
>>>To: "Randy Benn" <randybenn at gmail.com>,"John Antonelli" 
>>><Johnantonelli at verizon.net>,"David Schoenberger" 
>>><davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>>>CC: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
>>>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>>>Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:29:21 -0400
>>>
>>>More on this.....
>>>
>>>Yesterday I sent an e-mail concerning Montgomery County Fire Rescue and I 
>>>was using an old list of channels and talk-groups for my info.  I 
>>>mentioned, however, that some changes were in the works to allow units to 
>>>use mobile repeaters, to be installed in the Battalion Chief buggies. 
>>>I've now learned that this will result in changing of the way a number of 
>>>zones are named. Zone 8, for example, will become Zone 71.  Zone 9 will 
>>>become Zone 72.  Zone 10 will become Zone 79.
>>>
>>>So, for example, a unit being told to switch to the EMRC "calling" TG 
>>>will be told to switch to 72-C, rather than 9-C. I think the mobile 
>>>repeaters will be operating on 7-N, 71-N and 72-N.  There will be many 
>>>other changes.
>>>
>>>I believe the changeover is supposed to be completed by November.
>>>
>>>Stay tuned,
>>>
>>>
>>>Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Benn" <randybenn at gmail.com>
>>>To: "John Antonelli" <Johnantonelli at verizon.net>; "David Schoenberger" 
>>><davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>>>Cc: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>>>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:44 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>>>
>>>
>>>>I filled some of the holes on my original list, based on responses I 
>>>>received so far:
>>>>
>>>>0: DC
>>>>1: Arlington
>>>>2: Alexandria
>>>>3: MWAA
>>>>4: Fairfax
>>>>5: Prince William
>>>>6: Loudoun
>>>>7: Montgomery
>>>>8: Stafford
>>>>9: Hosp Patches?
>>>>10:
>>>>11: Faquier
>>>>12: Culpeper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Randy
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Antonelli" 
>>>><Johnantonelli at verizon.net>
>>>>To: "David Schoenberger" <davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>>>>Cc: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>>>>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:04 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dc is 0 stafford is 8
>>>>>
>>>>>David Schoenberger wrote:
>>>>>>Randy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know about 8, 9, and 10, but 12 is Culpeper.  DC may be
>>>>>>considered 0, though I'm not positive about that.  (Their primary
>>>>>>channels start with 0.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 7/16/06, Randy Benn <randybenn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>Can anyone help me fill in the blanks on these channel assignments 
>>>>>>>from Metro Washington Council Of Governments?  I put together the 
>>>>>>>list below from RadioReference.com.  I couldn't seem to find anything 
>>>>>>>on the MWCOG web site.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  1: Arlington
>>>>>>>  2: Alexandria
>>>>>>>  3: MWAA
>>>>>>>  4: Fairfax
>>>>>>>  5: Prince William
>>>>>>>  6: Loudoun
>>>>>>>  7: Montgomery
>>>>>>>  8:
>>>>>>>  9:
>>>>>>>  10:
>>>>>>>  11: Faquier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Randy
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>
>
>