[Scan-DC] Re: Jeff's recent observations

[al]

>I should also stress that comparing a 780 (which is not a DSP based 
>scanner) to a PCR1000 (which is, at least in part, DSP) is like comparing 
>apples to oranges; both fruits with very different characteristics.

  Who care's about apples & oranges.
At the end of the day what does matter is how the radio performs.If a "DSP" 
radio does better things for me than a non-DSP radio then guess 
what....I'll take the DSP radio.

  Both the 780 & the PCR1000,in this case,are used for mil-air monitoring.I 
want to know,when looking for feed-back from owners,how each performs.It 
does not matter if one or the other has DSP or not.It does not matter if a 
problem lies with the "transmitter" or if,& this one's a reach,I'm pushing 
a radio too hard.What DOES matter is how the radio handles these *problems*.

  The PCR1000 in two "feed-back" posts did better than the 780 re 
intermod/images.A diatribe on why this can not be fact but only because the 
owner is to dumb to know how to use his/her radios or describe an exact use 
of a word will not change the end result.

  If it quacks like a duck....

  Al
--
al dudley ....wash dc metro , usa
     ald61650 at comcast.net
            *************
    pro 2006,2052,pcr1000,r100