[Scan-DC] Thank you Daryll Symington

[daryll@radioinfosystems.com]

Hello John,

Thanks for the updates.  I'll include them in the next upload.  

There are 15404 frequencies in those lists.  I hesitated for several YEARS
to even make them available to others, because of the "experts" pointing
out a couple of freqs that may be out of date, or, heaven forbid, just
plain wrong.  But, I figured somebody ought to at least give it a try, and
maybe those who are interested in military monitoring can have a starting
point.  I have not been able to locate any other non-commercial sources,
except for several very localized lists.  

I was also going to post my extensive tactical callsign and DSN numbers
lists, but don't know if there is any real demand for it.

Thanks again for your info.  Anyone else who wishes to send along confirmed
info can just drop me an email at the address above.  

Daryll
----------------------------                  

----- Original Message -----
From: john wilson <jwilson9@erols.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:43:20 PM
To: Jeffery R. Smith <j333_76484@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] Thank you Daryll Symington

>    This is a nice effort.  Unfortunately in spot checking a couple of Army
> installations in my listening area, some of the frequency information is
not
> correct and would be fruitless monitoring for anyone listening to those
> frequencies.  For example, the Ft. Eustis  MPs left 407.475 mhz. several
years
> ago and now are part of the Newport News 800 mhz. trunked system.  Ft.
Lee has
> only one PE frequency, 173.6125 mhz.  There is no second PE frequency. 
149.800
> was an old ambulance frequency that is no longer used.  There never was
any
> "medical net".  The Ft. Lee ambulance uses the 155.340 HEAR system only. 
There
> is no EOD team and the 49 mhz. frequencies listed are bogus.  The CID no
longer
> uses 141.325 mhz. but is part of the 400 mhz. trunked system at Bellwood.
There
> are other errors, but I mention only a few.  This is the main problem with
> military frequency information that has been perpetuated through the years
> culled from various sources.  There seem to be only "adds", never any
changes or
> deletes.  These frequency listings should not be taken as gospel.  But,
it is a
> commendable effort and is something compared to nothing.
> 
> 
> "Jeffery R. Smith" wrote:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > Maybe I am just behind the curve here but I stumbled into the following
freq
> > resource. This is the first time I have seen it so I thought I would
put it
> > out to all for informational purposes.
> >
> > http://www.radioinfosystems.com/links.htm
> >         Military Facilities Frequency Lists
> >
> > It was put together by Daryll Symington who I must say has done a
fantastic
> > job.
> >
> > Have a good one,
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scan-DC mailing list
> > Scan-DC@mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> 
> --