[SADXA] The results are in

[Wes]

Thanks Darrel.

On 4/30/2020 9:29 PM, Darrel wrote:
> From the latest ARRL newsletter:
>
> *"Frequency Measuring Test Results Posted*
> /... The Top 10 looked like this, with average error rates in ppm. Bill De 
> Carle, VE2IQ, has posted a ranked //list 
> <http://k5cm.com/rankings%20april%202020.txt>//of participants who submitted 
> readings for both frequencies./
>
> /1./
>
> 	
>
> /WA5FRF/
>
> 	
>
> /0.004902/
>
> /2./
>
> 	
>
> /WA2IKL/
>
> 	
>
> /0.005584/
>
> */3./*
>
> 	
>
> */N7WS/*
>
> 	
>
> */0.005636/*
>
> /4./
>
> 	
>
> /N9CIF/
>
> 	
>
> /0.006999/
>
> /5./
>
> 	
>
> /NJ0U/
>
> 	
>
> /0.007051/
>
> /6./
>
> 	
>
> /N8OBJ/
>
> 	
>
> /0.007655/
>
> /7./
>
> 	
>
> /AD5MT/
>
> 	
>
> /0.008415/
>
> /8./
>
> 	
>
> /KB3UMD/
>
> 	
>
> /0.008415/
>
> /9./
>
> 	
>
> /WB6RJH/
>
> 	
>
> /0.008492/
>
> /10/
>
> 	
>
> /AB4RS/
>
> 	
>
> /0.009174/
>
> "
> Congratulations to Wes, N7WS. That  0.005 parts per million is very 
> impressive.  The leading stations all had about 0.005 ppm average error - I 
> bet that's set by Doppler shifts in the ionosphere rather than anything 
> instrumental.
>
> That's an extremely impressive result.  (I reckon it's much more impressive 
> than 9-band DXCC!)
>
>             Cheers,
>                    Darrel, aa7fv.
>
> On 4/26/2020 8:01 PM, Wes wrote:
>> For the Spring ARRL Frequency Measuring Test (FMT). 
>> http://fmt.arrl.org/fmtcurresults.php
>>
>> For the second time, I made the top tier.  Not like 9-band DXCC but still a 
>> challenge.
>>
>> Wes  N7WS
>>
>>
>