[SADXA] The results are in

[Darrel]

 From the latest ARRL newsletter:

*"Frequency Measuring Test Results Posted*
/... The Top 10 looked like this, with average error rates in ppm. Bill 
De Carle, VE2IQ, has posted a ranked //list 
<http://k5cm.com/rankings%20april%202020.txt>//of participants who 
submitted readings for both frequencies./

/1./

	

/WA5FRF/

	

/0.004902/

/2./

	

/WA2IKL/

	

/0.005584/

*/3./*

	

*/N7WS/*

	

*/0.005636/*

/4./

	

/N9CIF/

	

/0.006999/

/5./

	

/NJ0U/

	

/0.007051/

/6./

	

/N8OBJ/

	

/0.007655/

/7./

	

/AD5MT/

	

/0.008415/

/8./

	

/KB3UMD/

	

/0.008415/

/9./

	

/WB6RJH/

	

/0.008492/

/10/

	

/AB4RS/

	

/0.009174/

"
Congratulations to Wes, N7WS. That  0.005 parts per million is very 
impressive.  The leading stations all had about 0.005 ppm average error 
- I bet that's set by Doppler shifts in the ionosphere rather than 
anything instrumental.

That's an extremely impressive result.  (I reckon it's much more 
impressive than 9-band DXCC!)

             Cheers,
                    Darrel, aa7fv.

On 4/26/2020 8:01 PM, Wes wrote:
> For the Spring ARRL Frequency Measuring Test (FMT). 
> http://fmt.arrl.org/fmtcurresults.php
>
> For the second time, I made the top tier.  Not like 9-band DXCC but 
> still a challenge.
>
> Wes  N7WS
>
>