[SADXA] County tower limit

[W6XI]

I have a very negative view of  the bunch running this part of the world. 
Thus I best not say much.

I read the article and it reeks of politics, not in my back yard mentality, 
no understanding of what they are talking about and also not a whole lot of 
interest in finding a solution to the problem, only making points for the 
next election.

But then what's new.

You are right about the ham community taking preemptive action. It needs a 
leader however.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wes Stewart" <n7ws at yahoo.com>
To: "Southern AZ DX Association E-Mail Reflector" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [SADXA] County tower limit


What Gail was belatedly referring to was this:

http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/322850.php

I read that and figured the the people at the county would probably fail to 
see a difference between ham towers and cellular towers. You know the 
nitwits in the Tucson Mountain association will lump them together.

I think that the ham community should be taking preemptive measures to 
educate the Board of Supes about the benefits we hams provide in delivering 
emergency communications, and how detrimental restrictive tower limits are 
in that regard.

To be sure we went through this before, but these are politicians whose 
memories are no longer than the last lobbying effort from the latest squeaky 
wheel.

Wes N7WS

--- On Sun, 12/27/09, GAIL E PETERSON <n7bxx at q.com> wrote:

From: GAIL E PETERSON <n7bxx at q.com>
Subject: Re: [SADXA] County tower limit
To: "SADXA mail list" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>
Date: Sunday, December 27, 2009, 11:33 AM


The top story in Sundays paper

> From: JDWOTHE at COX.NET
> To: sadxa at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:12:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: [SADXA] County tower limit
>
> What is this in reference to?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "GAIL E PETERSON" <n7bxx at q.com>
> To: "SADXA mail list" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 10:34 AM
> Subject: [SADXA] County tower limit
>
>
> >
> > We need to make sure there is an exemption for HAM towers Gail
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
> >
> > SADXA mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
>
> SADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org

SADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




______________________________________________________________
SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org

SADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html