[RVRC] FW: Hamfest info

[E Drew Moore]

Why don't we just use 146.52, 55 or 58. They get little use these days and
are good to have programmed in our radio. If we interfere with anyone we can
always invite them to the best hamfest in the area. Sure beats packet
interference.

73
Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: rvrc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:rvrc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of Bryan D. Boyle
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:13 PM
To: rvrc at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [RVRC] Hamfest info

On 4/11/2011 8:37 PM, nw2p at w2qw.net wrote:
> We are getting close to our hamfest June 18th.
> 
> Our hamfest frequency was at  144.310 pl 141.3.
> 
> This in the satellite protected band. We should think about moving this.I
> don't think any of you are using crystals anymore

Some are...but not a big deal for the fest.

> I think we should go to a
> half channel in the packet range if anyone has a better idea, listen to it
> and let me know.
> 
>  

According to the League band plan, there are a few places we can move on
a non-interference basis:


144.90-145.10 	Weak signal and FM simplex (145.01,03,05,07,09
                are widely used for packet)
145.50-145.80 	Miscellaneous and experimental modes
146.40-146.58 	Simplex
147.42-147.57 	Simplex


> If you don't have a specific hamfest assignment, try to be at the park as
> near 5;30 as possible.
> 

Will try, but it will be tough, due to distance...:)

73 BB

______________________________________________________________
RVRC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/rvrc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:RVRC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html