Re: [RRDXA] Re: Interessante (rechnerische) Betrachung zur Call Nennung bei Expeditions und Contest Aktivitäten von CT1BOH

[Werner Maier]

Hi,

> CT1BOH's calculation of 'waste of time' is purely hypothetical and theoretical.
> He will work more dupes because of people like me and like Mark says: casual
> DXers just move on.

That's right, but let's see the other hand:
I've been @OZ5E for CQWW-CW 2004+2005. Well, OZ is not that dx, but in
CQWW-CW it is quite rare. And you get quite a pileup just with calling.
I'm not a 110%-top-op, so I hade some problems when 3-4 stations
called simultaneously in CW near the zero beat frequency.

So I used IDing to feed the pileup if there have been less answers to my call,
and stopped IDing, if there have been to much answers for me to handle.

(but I still tried to sign at least all 3-4 QSOs).

> I also don't like the 'EE' in stead of 'TU'. I don't know
> why but 'TU' is more polite and good for the flow, no?

I agree 100%. There's allways time for TU. Ham radio is still a hobby.

73s de Werner DL4NER
--
Dipl.-Ing. Univ. Werner Maier
http://www.maiers.de/