[R-390] Cam alignment

[SCOTT Barry]

If the front panel is out of the way, the counter is relatively easy to 
"slip".

Barry - N4BUQ

On 8/1/2026 5:20 PM, Paul Roche wrote:
> That’s not really what I was talking about but that’s OK. I got everything back together. All cams set for 7.000+ except now the “frequency wheel” reads 9, not 7 and I can’t turn the MHZ knob to get to 0; the detent before the “full stop” is 1 MHz and the wheel reads 3. I guess my 10 turn stop is off; this will require thinking and reading. I hope I don’t pull the whole RF deck off again.
>
> This is not enjoyable. I think I’ll put this thing back together, put it on a shelf, and maybe after a few weeks or months come back and revisit this. It’s really more mechanical than electrical and that’s not so much fun right now because I’ve got a radio that’s a whole bunch of gears and I just don’t know how to get everything synced up right. Oh well, the price was right. Free
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 1, 2026, at 3:25 PM, Jordan Arndt <Outposter30 at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Paul....
>>
>> I think you're referring to the PTO travel visa-vis the 10 turn stops, which should allow for +/- 20-25 khz  of over-travel at each end. It is also important that the PTO is centered within the Dial Adj. range...
>>
>> 73...Jordan VE6ZT
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Roche via R-390" <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
>> To: "Barry SCOTT" <n4buq at knology.net>
>> Cc: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2026 1:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [R-390] Cam alignment
>>
>>
>>> I am sure I am wording my question incorrectly! I thought I remember reading somewhere that when turning the MHZ dial it should be maybe 1/4 turn until it hits the first detent at 0.000 MHz I was just wondering if I don’t set it in the detent at 7.000+ would I still have some range a little above and a little below the ends of the bands. As I said, I’m probably not making it clear,
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2026, at 1:44 PM, SCOTT Barry via R-390 <r-390 at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>>> I'm not completely sure I'm following your question, but the detent position only changes with the MC change knob's rotation so at 7.000+ MC, the spring should still be in one of the detents regardless of the rotation of the KC change knob.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I might be misunderstanding the question.
>>>>
>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>> I am trying to align my cams to exactly 7.000+ MHZ and I have a question about the planetary gear with that spring. I thought I read I should install it with the detents halfway between the spring position. But if I do that, now when it hits the detent, it is not 7.00+ anymore.
>>>>> When I’m putting this together, should I install that planetary gear with a detent engaged at the 7.000+? I hope this makes sense.
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>
>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> R-390 mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html