[R-390] Correction in My ER Article

[William G Feldmann]

Yes Dan,

Your right, I messed up again the correct P/N doesn't have the 40 after the
P.  It should be 653-G6A-274P-DC48 for the 5ma. relay.

Sorry,

Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Merz" <mdmerz at verizon.net>
To: "'William G Feldmann'" <n6py at qnet.com>; "'R390 LISTINGS'"
<r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:40 PM
Subject: RE: [R-390] Correction in My ER Article


> Hi Bill,  but the P/N you give in the email is for the 8 ma relay and is
> the same as in the ER article.  Isn't the correct P/N 653-G6A-274P-DC48
for
> the 5 ma type?  At least it appears as such in my 627 catalog p 1363. Or
am
> I missing something here?  Enjoyed reading the article and appears to be a
> good mod that I may try someday.   Dan.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-390-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:r-390-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of William G Feldmann
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:53 PM
> To: R390 LISTINGS
> Subject: [R-390] Correction in My ER Article
>
> Hi All,
>
> I made a big P/N goof in my R-390A article in the September issue of
> Electric Radio.  I just found out about it when I returned this week from
my
> New Mexico vacation.  It was my fault not being more careful re-looking up
> the part number after doing the modification and loosing the bag with the
> part number the relay came in.
>
> I mistakenly listed in the text for the product detector modification a
8ma.
> coil relay instead of the 5ma. one I used.  The right Mouser P/N is
> 653-G6A-274P40-DC48.  But if someone has already ordered the wrong relay
it
> will work fine if a 22K coil resistor is used in place of the 39K in the
> schematic for R2B.  Also I used a 5 watt metal film resistor for R2B
because
> I happened to have one and not a 2 watt that is smaller and will work fine
> since the required dissipation is only .94 watts.  So a 2 watt will work
> fine for R2B if you have one or are ordering the resistor.
>
> There will be a correction in the October issue but just wanted to give
> those of you on the reflector a heads up because some of you may be the
most
> likely to use the modification.  Also readers seem to often miss the
> corrections.  Next time I'll be more careful.
>
> Bill N6PY
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>
>