[R-390] R-390 "deadly components"

[Llgpt at aol.com]

The R-390 didn't need as many repairs as the R-390A. It was a cost reduced  
version to save money. Something that seems to be foreign to todays  
politicians.
 
Les Locklear
 
 
In a message dated 5/23/2005 10:04:57 PM Central Daylight Time,  
bipi at comcast.net writes:

I rather  think of the R390A as a design solution to make the radio easier 
and less  expensive to repair, which I'm sure was an overriding design  
requirement.  There may be some performance differences, but I like  to think 
the "A" model is more than adequate!  Just my humble  opinion...

73 de Mike
K7PI