[R-390] R-390 sideband adapter
Bob Camp
ham at cq.nu
Sun Jan 16 17:36:01 EST 2005
Hi
I think that the CV-591 is a known item in the market. The newer "ham"
solid state stuff is not as well known. I like my Sherwood just fine,
but it's not as well known as a CV-591.
There's also the approach of doing this all with tubes and avoiding any
solid state stuff in the reception chain. That is understandable, but
it's not what everybody might want to do.
Take Care!
Bob Camp
KB8TQ
On Jan 16, 2005, at 5:18 PM, DJED1 at aol.com wrote:
> I've found it interesting watching eBay the last couple of days- A
> CV-591
> SSB adapter went for $475, yet a solid-state SSB adapter kit by Jan
> Skirrow at
> $150 hasn't seen a bid. Is it just tubes versus solid state, or are
> most not
> interested in SSB? I've been using the adapter I built several years
> ago,
> and I think it works better than the CV-591 I used to have.
> Ed
> _____________________________________________________________
> Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
> Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>
More information about the R-390
mailing list