[R-390] R-390 sideband adapter

Bob Camp ham at cq.nu
Sun Jan 16 17:36:01 EST 2005


Hi

I think that the CV-591 is a known item in the market. The newer "ham" 
solid state stuff is not as well known. I like my Sherwood just fine, 
but it's not as well known as a CV-591.

There's also the approach of doing this all with tubes and avoiding any 
solid state stuff in the reception chain. That is understandable, but 
it's not what everybody might want to do.

	Take Care!

		Bob Camp
		KB8TQ



On Jan 16, 2005, at 5:18 PM, DJED1 at aol.com wrote:

> I've found it interesting watching eBay the last couple of days-   A 
> CV-591
> SSB adapter went for $475, yet a solid-state SSB adapter kit by Jan 
> Skirrow at
> $150 hasn't seen a bid.   Is it just tubes versus solid state, or are 
> most not
> interested in SSB?   I've been using the adapter I built several years 
> ago,
> and I think it works better than the CV-591 I used to have.
> Ed
> _____________________________________________________________
> Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
> Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>



More information about the R-390 mailing list