[R-390] R-390A trouble (I FOUND THE PROBLEM)

Bill Smith [email protected]
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:22:53 -0800


Good eye, Jim.  I think the receiver "wants" to work, and it looks like you
helped it out a bit.  :-)

You can replace the terminal in the tube socket by finding another of the
same manufacturer and, using long nose pliers, remove a terminal by pushing
the solder end through the phenolic.  In a miniature tube socket, there is
usually a "bump" in the metal that prevents the terminal from falling out.
A moderate push usually is all that is needed to release the terminal, which
can then be removed from the tube-end (top) of the socket.

Then, simply remove the old metal fragments in the receiver socket and
insert the replacement through the top.  It only goes in one way, so make
sure the terminal side of the metal assembly matches the orientation of the
other terminals in the tube socket.  Once it is in place, give the terminal
end a very slight twist with long nose pliers to secure it.

Replacing tube-socket terminals in late National receivers (HRO 50's and
60's) is a routine.

73 de Bill, AB6MT
[email protected]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Temple" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 7:44 AM
Subject: Fw: [R-390] R-390A trouble (I FOUND THE PROBLEM)


> After wiggling almost all the leads to confirm security, I discovered the
> following.....
>
> Pin 5 of V201/6DC6, from the underside, seemed to be in place and secure.
> Upon wiggling, it seemed loose, so I gently tugged on the pin lead and it
> came out of the socket from below the plastic.  It was broken between the
> socket pin and where it emerges from the socket mold on the bottom.
>
> Apparently, there was enough contact to do the initial alignment, and
after
> a couple of hours burn in, it insulated itself, creating the below
symptoms.
>
> What was maddening was that the break was within the plastic mold of pin
5,
> which took a tug to break it from the plastic.  Three components are
> attached.  Later I will summarize what was affected and the fix.
>
> WOW......this is one for the books.
>
> I think I will go for replacement, but if there is an easy fix, I will
> consider it.
>
> Well, thats it.  Thanks for the support and help with this problem.  After
I
> complete the repair, I will post a summary of the symptoms and fix.  So
long
> for now.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
> 73, KF4ICZ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Temple" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [R-390] R-390A trouble
>
>
> > OK, I replaced C227 .047.  The old one measured .075 when out of
circuit.
> I
> > have a picked-over RF parts deck that happend to have this cap.  It
> measured
> > .04745, so hopefully this is the problem.
> >
> > HOWEVER, I am going to clean, inspect, wiggle, tap, eyeball, and
generally
> > give it the twice over before reinstalling in the morning.  I'm winding
> down
> > for the night.
> >
> > Will report back after reinstallation of the RF deck in the morning.
> >
> > Thanks for the great support and suggestions.  Good night.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jim
> > 73, KF4ICZ
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Barry Hauser" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>; "Jim Temple" <[email protected]>;
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: [R-390] R-390A trouble
> >
> >
> > > > Barry, I think you've got it.
> > > >
> > > > But I thought of another thing to try. Because the set is
> > > > oscillating within itself, something common to the IF and
> > > > RF decks is carrying energy between them.
> > > <snipped>
> > >
> > > Got what?  I dunno, but, hey, Bill, I think YOU"RE onto something.
Jim
> > > should check out all those jumpers with the mini-BNC's -- maybe one of
> 'em
> > > was swapped with that Skyhighgain cable Norman told us about.
> > >
> > > Seriously, tho' -- wasn't that another thing that could cause weird
> > > problems -- bad mini-coax?
> > >
> > > When the rational, logical, informed, incisive, deductive approach
fails
> > ...
> > > Well, let's consider ALL the clues ...
> > >
> > > Squeal -- loud disturbing noise, alarm, or (sl.) to give information,
to
> > > "rat" on.
> > > Happens over 3 MC's, that could be written as >3.  Looks like a bird,
> > don't
> > > it?
> > > Motorboating, boats, water, ocean -- could be a seagull, or maybe
> > > "putt-putt" = golf
> > > Then there's the thing about cats.  Wait a minute!  A bird that looks
> like
> > a
> > > rat is a bat -- but then what's golf got to do with it?  This is going
> > > nowhere -- might mean something to a witch.  Is Les around?
> > >
> > > Forget all that -- pull the RF deck and check it out.  Could be an
> > > "underneath-ARGHHH-do-I-hafta?" problem.  Give it the close eyeball
> > > inspection.  By all means CLEAN the bandswitch -- twice. (unless I
> missed
> > > something and you did that already)
> > >
> > > Nobody seems to be focused on the >3 thing.  Why would this problem
kick
> > in
> > > there?  What is different circuitry-wise about 0-1-2-3 vs 4+?  I guess
> one
> > > thing might be a rotor section or two on the bandswitch, no?  Maybe
not.
> > > Any particular reason a bad cap would cause the squeal and
motorboating
> to
> > > start at 4 MC's?
> > >
> > > Great, now I'm gonna be up all night 'cause of somebody else's radio.
> > >
> > > Barry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > R-390 mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> > >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390