[QCWA] 2008 Election Results

[qcwa at texoma.net]

Bob....Please explain to me (and others) the slow demise in the number of 
chapters and the low, slow numbers of those coming into the hobby and QCWA.

Maybe a "numbers of years plus one's age" shoud be a way of recruiting.  

de K5ZYZ

> tnx Steve,
> 
> I welcome whatever constructive comments anyone has to make, but I do
> disagree with you.
> 
> Amateur Radio is not "s-l-o-w-l-y fading".  We've seen growth in the past
> few years and it's time those of us on the inside stop spreading doom and
> gloom about the best hobby in the world.
> 
> The topic of; less than 25 years, associate members, friends of QCWA or
> whatever else you wish to call them has been addressed by every board 
for at
> least the past ten years.  I'm not going to spend this boards time on 
what
> appears to be an issue with little support.
> 
> That being said Steve, if you feel that a majority of the members of QCWA
> feel as you do, I encourage you to seek redress in the constitution.  
It's
> on the website as part of: http://www.qcwa.org/history.pdf.  See  
ARTICLE VI
> AMENDMENTS, Section 1 for the procedure to petition for a change in the
> constitution.
> 
> I know from first hand experience that petitions can and do work in QCWA!
> 
> gl es 73,
> Bob Roske, NØUF
> QCWA President Elect
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

> 73,
> Bob Roske, NØUF
> QCWA President Elect
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <qcwa at texoma.net>
> To: "Discussion of QCWA or Ham Radio" <qcwa at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [QCWA] 2008 Election Results
> 
> 
> >>> Bob Roske, NØUF
> >> QCWA Reflector Administrator
> >> >
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> > Bob and the Board of Directors....
> >
> > Congratulations to one and all. Let's keep QCWA on the move by 
eliminating
> > that (now) stupid 25 year requirement!
> >
> > Ham radio is s-l-o-w-l-y fading and so is QCWA, it MUST be repaired 
before
> > it is too late.
> >
> > For those old "stick in the muds", it's time to start building, not
> > continue to allow QCWA to fade, too.
> >
> > I request that with the NEXT election that the MEMBERS be accorded an
> > opportunity to vote on the 25 year requirement.
> >
> > I'll vote to eliminate such an useless, antique requirement. It has 
long
> > outlived its usefullness.
> >
> > Steve brodie,
> > K5ZYZ
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.
> > http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > QCWA mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.
http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/