[QCWA] Is APRS legal? QCWA President says NO!

W1EOF w1eof at hamnutz.com
Sat May 7 19:09:11 EDT 2005


I'm guessing that's what this is all about Bill. I've been a member of this
list for a few years now and have not seen a post from Gene before. Suddenly
there is this big crisis that must be dealt with?

Gene if you feel like QCWA needs to move in a new direction, that's fair
game for discussion. I don't quite understand the tone of the emails. Maybe
I'm misreading them, but personally they seem more pot-stirring than
thought-provoking.

Are you running for a QCWA office Gene?


73,

Mark W1EOF


> -----Original Message-----
> From: William M. Pasternak [mailto:newsline at ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 5:27 PM
> To: Discussion of QCWA
> Subject: Re: [QCWA] Is APRS legal? QCWA President says NO!
>
>
> At 11:08 AM 5/7/05, you wrote:
> >"So what is to be done?  If you are concerned that President Johnston is
> >reinforcing the image of QCWA as a bunch of "old pharts", then make your
> >view known to QCWA officers and members of the BoD.  But more important,
> >let's try through the election process to get someone in the
> office who is
> >responsive to member concerns."
>
>
> If this subject is of that much importance to you then one would think it
> to be incumbent upon you to declare yourself a candidate for this
> office in
> the next election.  As one who has run a not-for-profit
> organization since
> 1977 -- the past 5 years as a federally chartered 501(c)(3) -- I
> have come
> to believe that those who criticize have an obligation to provide an
> alternative by offering themselves as a replacement.
>
> de
> Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> QCWA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
>
>



More information about the QCWA mailing list