[QCWA] It's official... we are secondary.

Robert N Meyer KB0GT at ARRL.net
Sat Oct 30 21:39:39 EDT 2004


Don't panic, people.  We've all been hearing how BPL causes interference 
to our service.  Well, guess what, IT GOES BOTH WAYS!

Their big network of wires not only operates as a transmitting antenna, 
but it acts as a receiving antenna.  The local radio club (Rochester, 
MN) got TOGETHER with the local power company to do co-operative 
testing.  They taped signals off the air while the power company 
switched things on and off.  Did it cause interference?  Oh, yeah.  It 
even totally blocked WWV.  No suprises there.

What was very interesting, and what I had heard nothing about before, 
was the effect of ham radio on BPL:

A 25 watt 40m signal transmitted 2 blocks away into a mobile vertical 
caused a complete (100%) blockage of packet flow on the BPL network!  A 
10 watt 80 signal in a multiband dipole 65' away completely blocked BPL 
network traffic.

Think about that!  A kw into a beam would probably block BPL for miles 
in whatever direction the beam is pointing.

You can see more details at:
	http://www.io.com/~nielw/BPL/RF_susceptibility.htm

-- Bob Meyer, KB0GT


More information about the QCWA mailing list