[Qcwa] CW Requirement

Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:01:10 -0400

Keith... I think you mean YES.

73,

Mark W1EOF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Gilbertson, Keith
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Qcwa] CW Requirement
>
>
> NO---I would like to see us retain at least the five(5) wpm requirement we
> have now,
> As I don't see us ever returning to the 20 wpm we had. GL, 73,
> Keith,  K0KG
>
> Keith Gilbertson
> 218-846-7465
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Copeland [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Qcwa] CW Requirement
>
>
> Fellow QCWA Members,
>
>
> Since it seems that not every QCWA member wants to keep the code as a
> requirement to operate HF, how about an unofficial survey?
>
> Should CW be retained as a license requirement to operate below 30mhz?
>
>
> YES or NO and why
>
>
> I will tally the results and report back on 7-23
>
> Dan N0DT
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
>