[Qcwa] CW requirement
Jeffrey D Angus
[email protected]
Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:00:41 -0700
Jim Wilhite wrote:
>but feel the Extra Class should require a broader knowledge base
>including CW ability, which is a viable method of communication
>that our entire history is based upon.
>
Well, then shouldn't there be testing for knowledge and/or proficiency
of spark and
other things that are "part of our heritage"?
Ya know, it's funny. I was reading _50 years of the ARRL_ the past few
days. And
in in the 50's people were bitching about appliance operators. Oh, and I
might add,
the relevancy of morse code. There was talk about "I wish the ARRL would
stop
trying to force SSB down our throats." And a great wailing and gnashing
of teeth
because Collins dropped their AM transmitter line. Go figure. I guess
part of the
tradition of amateur radio is being a Luddite.
Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom"