[Qcwa] Devil's advocate
J. Craswell
[email protected]
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:07:55 -0600
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Qcwa] Devil's advocate
> Right on Augie. And I won't give up my 160 meter Carolina Windom until
the
> 160 meter full size loop is up and operational. People seem to forget
that
> so many of these CC&Rs invoke so many silly rules that to remove a tree in
> your front yard, you need permission from the architectual committee or to
> paint your front door, you need permission. It is a wonder they don't
require
> you to get permission before you flush the toilet these days.
>
> Maury
> W4HYB
>
> PS What ever happened to freedom of speech and the rights of individual
> property owners anyway?
I hate to add gas to this fire twice in the same day but we bought a new
toilet and the darn thing won't flush worth a darn. It's a "law" that these
new improved toilets use less water. So instead of working right the first
time you have to hold the lever or flush two or three times. And unlike my
old "illegal" toilet in the old house I've been forced to regularly plunger
out this new Legal one. My suggestion is this.
For every new law on the books 2 (Or make it any number above 1 such as 1.5)
old laws need to be "flushed." That is my "PUN"ishment for the day. This
will cause the people thinking up great ideas like these goofy toilet laws
to think twice and anyway it happens we will be cutting down on the
unbelievable number of laws that govern us.
73 de W0VNE "Jay"
p.s. Look around at the Stepford wives housing being put in everywhere. All
houses will look exactly the same and if you don't like it watch out!