[Pro2006] What to do!
Len G. Carpenter
Len.C at sympatico.ca
Thu Jun 17 20:20:45 EDT 2004
There is a place in the UK that sold an identical radio, not sure what it was called
now, so you should be able to source it locally.
Wessuk at aol.com wrote:
>
> HI Bob and thanks for your interesting input. I was one of those guys that
> even though being careful i still managed to crack the LCD display on 2006
> which absolutely gutted me. Bob would you know of any one that may have an LCD
> display that would suit my 2006, or maybe a broken scanner that i could use the
> LCD panel from? I have tried radio shack but they will not ship to me here
> in England UK. Any help or advise would be warmly appreciated as i so much
> want to revive my beloved 2006.
>
> Regards to all at QTH
>
> Wess....England UK
>
>
>
> In a message dated 17/06/2004 14:22:25 GMT Daylight Time,
> bwhiston at baldwinfarm.org writes:
>
> At 21:32 15-06-04, you wrote:
> >Hello Laird and other fans of these great Radio Shack scanners,
> >
> >1. I have a couple of Pro-2004s that don't work, and display some weird
> >symptoms. When he was alive, Bill Cheek emailed me that many of the
> >problems were related to bad soldering on the motherboard. I got the
> >scanners used, and it looks like someone has tried some repair or
> >modification of the radios.
>
> OK... The PRO-2004s suffered from a bit more than *just* `poor'
> solder jobs. They also have poor through plated holes on the assorted
> circuit boards. (I've got a pair of them myself and have `fought with'
> them quite a bit over the years. I also finally just through in the towel
> a couple years ago and basically let both of them `die' and went and dug
> out a pair of 2006s I had stashed away. I figured that until I could
> actually get a *real* `repair bench' back up and running, having children
> and needing that `spare bedroom' that was originally one's `lab' is *where*
> my `lab' went, I could `get by' for a while. {WAN GRIN!}) Anyway... What
> you will need to be able to do is first get youself both a good schematic
> *and* board layouts. Next... You will have to *CAREFULLY* go through
> *each* board, starting with the power supply section then proceding to the
> audio section, and then the digital section, and finally the RF section,
> *CAREFULLY* wiggling all the wires followed by all the `wired' components
> noting the results. Put a marker on those points where you find a
> problem. After you've got a board full of markers the next thing will be
> to carefully touch-up the solder joints on those points taking care to keep
> from overheating whatever it is you are resoldering. This phase will
> probably entail several passes through before one can be halfway assured
> they have gotten all those bad spots. Be especially careful about getting
> *both* sides of each connection! (Remember I mentioned problems with
> through plated holes!)
>
> OK... Now that you've pretty much taken care of *most* of the
> `problems' it is time to go after the next set, `sour traces'. For these
> this is where having access to *both* a schematic and board layouts come in
> handy. The main places *I* found `sour traces' were between
> interconnection `cables' and components. IE: A ribbon cable is attached to
> the board in one place but it doesn't go directly to the components it
> shows on the schematic and instead goes to a set of `pads' that then have
> traces that *do* go to the components. (One of my 2004s actually has about
> 1 & 1/2 dozen jumper wires with `micro-clips' running from either cable to
> component or bypassing the cable and going directly from component on one
> board to component on another board! Amazingly enough I actually managed
> to get quite a few years of use out of it this way and the only reason it
> was `retired' along with it's `mate' was that I was going to use it as an
> example to fix the `mate'. [Just as soon as I could get a `bench' back up.
> {WAN GRIN!}]) Anyway... I figure that *if* one *takes their time* and
> *carefully* goes through with just the resoldering and installing jumpers
> as needed one can get a 2004 pretty much back up and running in a few
> weeks. (I say `few weeks' because, as I keep emphasizing, *careful* is the
> `trick'! You *have* to check out *everything* and not just stop when it
> first flickers back to life because you've gotten the ones that have
> already `gone' and not the ones getting ready to go.)
>
> After that you can then address the display backlight problem. In
> both of mine I didn't replace the backlights with new EL panels even though
> I could have done so at the time. Bill and I had discussed the basic
> problems of the EL panels and it was decided that I would try to see if
> there might be a way to use LEDs instead. I managed to locate some `milk
> white' plastic that was thin enough to fit where the EL panel was mounted,
> trimmed a couple pieces to fit with some extra sticking out to provide a
> place to mount some LEDs, then I carefully *inset* the LEDs into the
> plastic so that the majority of the light from the LEDs would be difused
> through the plastic. (One *has* to be *very* careful about getting the
> original panel out from behind the readout *and* also careful that the
> plastic is thin enough to fit back behind because those readouts are
> irreplaceable and one doesn't want to crack them or in any other way damage
> it!) My first attempt didn't quite fully illuminate the whole display and
> I had to eventually carefully glue some thin foil to the backside to
> reflect back the light that was escaping out the backside. {GRIN!} (I
> also tried several different colours of LEDs eventually settling on yellow
> ones because they were the brightest I could find at the time that were
> also small enough. Today I suppose that one could pretty much choose most
> any colour since they have made some pretty serious advances in LED
> `tech-no-golly' and one can get some very small and bright ones in just
> about every colour.) The other `route' that one can also take now is
> replacing the EL panel with another one since EL panel `tech-no-golly'
> these days has also made some decent advances and one can get `experimenter
> kits' that one can pretty much cut out whatever size one may need. Either
> way, just like going through the boards and cables, the operative `word' is
> *still* *carefully*. As much as you'd like to get that `old friend' back
> up and running as quickly as possible it isn't something to rush.
>
> Having said all that I've said I think that if one just takes
> one's time and doesn't rush most anyone can repair and get running their
> 2004 *unless* one actually is one of those very few that are absolute
> `ditzes' when it comes to basic electronics and soldering. (If one *is*
> worried about their soldering abilities there actually are still some DIY
> kits out there that one can build first to get some soldering experience
> `under their belts' before attacking something like a 2004! They, like the
> 2004, call for something around a 25 or so watt soldering iron with a
> fairly `small' / `fine' tip along with being patient and not
> rushing.) Personally I would suggest that one acquire a `soldering
> station' that has the ability to use assorted different sized tips and use
> the smallest tip possible to do the job. In my case I am used to using an
> UNGAR adjustable temp soldering station but since it's not something that
> one can just go out and buy any old place I'd recommend that one try and
> find something along the lines of a WELLER WLC100 soldering station or
> WES51 `Electronic' soldering station and adjusting either one such that the
> tip you've selected will easily melt the solder without spattering and
> burning. (These `stations' can effectively give one an iron that can be as
> `light' as 10 watts and as `heavy' as approximately 50 watts depending upon
> both the adjustment and `job' without having to have a whole `collection'
> of irons! All one has to do is just pick a tip and and then adjust for
> proper solder melting.) As for solder... Again, *personally*, I use ERSIN
> `Multicore' solder but, any *quality* .040" dia. *rosin* core solder should
> work. (It shouldn't take all that much, just a `smiddgen', solder to fix
> most of the joint problems and *maybe* a tiny bit more for some of the
> `heavier' joints.)
>
> >2. I have some Pro-2006s that have the dim display problem, and need to
> >have the EL panel replaced. That is a lot of expense and work to do. I
> >don't have the time to attempt this repair myself. I was wondering if
> >there is a way to use a couple of LEDs to light the display.
>
> The 2006s shouldn't be any harder to fix than the 2004s and
> actually could be the first ones you *might* want to `attack'. All you
> have to do is remember that operative word *carefully* when you go in to
> `diddle' with that backlight. {GRIN!} I'd sure hate to hear that you've
> cracked the readout and are now looking for a replacement because you
> resorted to `brute force' to free the EL panel from behind the
> display! (By now *both* the 2004s and the 2006s `glue' has hardened and
> you *will* have to pick it away, slowly, piece by piece.)
>
> I'm *not* trying to scare you! I just want to let you know that
> it *can* be done but, you *do* have to exercise some reasonable caution and
> *not* try and `hurry' things along. Like Bill used to say... "Most anyone
> can do this stuff as long as they realize this *isn't* an old `hotrod' one
> is `cobbling together' out under the old shade tree in the backyard using
> the `cowboy', if it doesn't go get a bigger hammer, method." {VBSE
> GRIN!} I really wish that I had a bench back up so that I could try and
> help you by working on mine and talking you through the steps as we got to
> them!
>
> ---
> Doleo ergo sum,
> Bob Whiston
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pro2006 mailing list
> Pro2006 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pro2006
--
Thought for the day....
"Never hold your farts in, they travel up your spine, into your brain
and that's where you get crappy ideas from".
More information about the Pro2006
mailing list