[Premium-Rx] Replacing old tantalums?
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Mon Apr 13 16:22:54 EDT 2009
In a message dated 13/04/2009 20:34:21 GMT Daylight Time, greer86 at att.net
writes:
I would say use Mil spec M39003 or M39006 parts when possible. ePay
sellers
generally have them. One of the advantages is that if one fails it is not
going trash the circuit board in it vicinity as the infamous red end ones
do
in older WJ equipment.
--------------
More often than not, especially for kit out of active service, it isn't
even really necessary to replace tantalums with tantalums.
Capacitor technology has improved somewhat since the 70s and most failed
tantalums used for filtering could just as well be replaced with an
equivalent "normal" electrolytic.
Although I do like to keep equipment as original as possible, so would
usually refit the "correct" part later, I've got myself out of trouble more
than once by using a more modern electrolytic that's to hand.
The voltage rating is what's most important, as long as it physically fits
even the capacitance value isn't likely to be all that critical, within
reason, in most instances.
Given the overkill often practiced in supply line filtering there's more
than a fair chance with a single tantalum failure that you could just leave
it out and not make any difference:-)
regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list