[PPRAANet] [GMCC] CO QSO Party question
Steve **KT0DX**
kt0dx at comcast.net
Mon Aug 9 20:22:55 EDT 2010
Hi Dick do you know if anyone answered your e mail from the committee
? I had plans on working the COQP but noticed they still have the rules
from last year still up. I guess if nothing changes in the next week or
so I will cross this one off my list of contests to do.
Steve
On 8/9/2010 00:41, DickT-W0RAA wrote:
> I agree, Jim. But, if the people on the committee don't answer the question
> or address a possible problem, then I have a feeling the contest will die.
> That would be a sad thing to see. I hope somebody sees these comments and
> does something about it.
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Reisert AD1C"<jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
> To: "DickT-W0RAA"<dickt at w0raa.com>
> Cc: "PPRAA Reflector"<ppraanet at mailman.qth.net>;<k3ct at verizon.net>;
> <n2icarrl at gmail.com>; "Grand Mesa Contest Club"<gmc at mailman.qth.net>;
> "Steve Woodruff"<sjwoodr at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 3:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [GMCC] CO QSO Party question
>
>
>> It's also getting late if loggers like WriteLog etc. have to be changed to
>> support the new list.
>>
>> 73 - Jim AD1C
>>
>> On 8/8/2010 2:08 PM, DickT-W0RAA wrote:
>>> Can somebody on the COQP Committee please answer this query?
>>>
>>> I would think that if a question comes in that somebody would answer it.
>>>
>>> Letting it go unanswered is a sure way to kill interest in the COQP.
>>>
>>> Dick
>>> W0RAA
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Steve London"<n2icarrl at gmail.com>
>>> To: "'GMC'"<gmc at mailman.qth.net>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 1:34 PM
>>> Subject: [GMCC] [Fwd: [N1MM] CO QSO Party]
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyone have more info ?
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: [N1MM] CO QSO Party
>>>> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:46:47 -0400
>>>> From: John, K3CT<k3ct at verizon.net>
>>>> Reply-To: N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com
>>>> To:<N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The CO QSO party changed the VE multiplier list. Does anyone know if
>>>> anything else changed?
>>>>
>>>> Email to coqpinfo at ppraa.org has not been answered and last year's rules
>>>> have been removed.
>>>>
>>>> Please encourage your state coordinators to include this information for
>>>> the developers and users.
>>>>
>>>> John, K3CT
>>
>> --
>> Jim Reisert AD1C,<jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> PPRAANet mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ppraanet
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PPRAANet at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
More information about the PPRAANet
mailing list