[PPRAANet] Re: Thursday Night Net
Dennis Major - NØABC
N0ABC at msn.com
Fri Feb 8 19:57:54 EST 2008
If I might throw my 2¢ out there.....
I recall when I first read Ken's email on January 29, I also was initially
rather surprised that he specified 146.520 as the frequency to switch to at
the end of the majority/regular part of the net (on the repeater).
Especially considering that the net was held on .580 when it was still
simplex. However, after re-reading his email and considering the context, it
actually made sense to me to use the "National Simplex Calling Frequency"
(NSCF) (as the ARRL Repeater Directory describes it). From reading Ken's
email again, it sounded as though Ken only intended to be on the calling
frequency for a few minutes, and then only to establish contact with as many
of those QSYing as possible. I presumed that if there was a need to continue
beyond a few minutes, he would likely have everyone QSY again, especially as
he stated he was to be NCS on that Thursday.
Again, it is my belief that this limited (short period) use of the National
Simplex Calling Frequency is quite legitimate. As Ken indicated, it was to
emulate the loss of the repeater. As Ken probably does not have control
capability of the repeater, he could not disable the input of the repeater,
so attempting to use the output frequency would probably give terrible
results - all it would require is one person not hearing another on simplex,
to transmit on the input frequency and have the repeater blank out the
simplex stations. So, it makes sense for the NCS to call those moving from
the repeater net using the call frequency essentially as it was intended, so
long as the NCS moves the group to another frequency if it appears that
there will be any extended discussion.
Of course, if the NCS is not adhering to using the calling frequency as
briefly as possible, then certainly any participant or non-participant can
and should call it to his/her attention.
Another reason for using the NCSF in this situation is that it is the only
simplex frequency called out in the band plan - again, as a CALLING
frequency - so most hams are likely to have that one programmed into their
radios. At least more so than any other simplex frequency.
It's probably a good thing to have this discussion, as it illuminates some
of the finer points of a small but important aspect of our common hobby.
Unfortunately, the discussion was starting to sound almost "heated"? - maybe
I should say it had a slightly elevated temperature tone? :)
I think really we're all on the same page. Well, at least in the same
book/volume!
Reminder: VE session tomorrow morning, 9AM, CTU. Anyone for upgrading?
Dennis
N0ABC
More information about the PPRAANet
mailing list