[PPRAANet] Morse Code
Pete
saipan59 at att.net
Tue Dec 19 20:23:24 EST 2006
Removing the code *requirement* was the right thing to do.
We all understand the pros and cons of learning and/or using The Code. But
in the 21st century there is no reason for it to be *required* for a
license.
I assume that certain band segments are still CW-only, and I think this is
very appropriate.
Should the 21st century HAM license test have a suitable replacement for the
code requirement? Perhaps... Such as demonstrating an ability to handle
emergency traffic.
Or perhaps the test should get *really* relevant and cover knowledge of
modern digital encoding systems, spread spectrum, and the like (I'm assuming
that these topics have little or no coverage on the current tests - correct
me if I'm wrong.).
Regards,
Pete McCollum N0TDM ("No-code Tech")
>Subject: [PPRAANet] Morse Code
> Now that the FCC has removed the Morse code requirement from licensing, I
> have seen emails and posts for and against the issue. The FCC ruling
> affects us all, but how do individual members feel about this?
>
> I'm offering all the members of the PPRAA, MARC and any local ham to voice
> their opinions for and against the FCC ruling on removing Morse code. Your
> comments will be published in the January 2007 issue of Zero Beat. Now is
> your time to be heard. I welcome any and all comments, and will be
> including the comments on ham radio licenses on cereal boxes, inside
> Cracker Jacks, grab machines at Denny's. Funny, straight, or just a little
> wry this is your chance to let everyone know how you feel.
>
> 73 as always...
> Jackie Cornwell
> AC0CA
> Zero Beat Editor.
More information about the PPRAANet
mailing list