[PaQSO] Cabrillo Category Power value?????

[Ron Notarius W3WN]

 No disrespect intended towards anyone... 


But I miss the days when QRP meant no greater than 10.0 W output... and QRPp meant no greater than 1.0 W output.


Of course, this was also back in the days when I was running an Atlas 110 at 10 W output as my primary rig.  I don't want to think about how far back THAT was.  


73, ron w3wn

On 10/12/16, Hank Greeb wrote:

Actually, it is 5.0000000000001 to 150 watts. Thee must NOT operate 
more than 5 watts to be considered QRP. :)

On 10/12/2016 11:31 AM, Larry via PaQSO wrote:
> Howdy I believe the low / med range is 6 watts to 150 watts... Tnx de larry n3cr
>
> K3YD via PaQSO <paqso at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> My understanding is:
>> QRP up to 5 watts
>> LOW 6 watts to 100 watts (most transceivers fall into this range)
>> HIGH 101 to 1500 watts. (a few high power transceivers, and virtually all external amplifiers)
>>
>> Again, you gotta use common sense. An Elecraft K3 can be dialed back to an accurate 5 watts and be QRP.
>>
>> Does your medium power fall into any of these ranges?
>>
>> 73, Blair k3yd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dave Edmonds <dave at pkministrywebs.com>
>> To: <paqso at mailman.qth.net> <paqso at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2016 10:51 pm
>> Subject: [PaQSO] Cabrillo Category Power value?????
>>
>> Hi PAQP,
>>
>> N3FJP sw gives me a choice of
>>
>> CATEGORY-POWER: LOW
>> CATEGORY-POWER: HIGH
>> CATEGORY-POWER: QRP
>>
>> There is not option for MEDIUM...
>>
>> What do I use for CATEGORY-POWER
>>
>> Maybe I'm asking too many questions, but I didn't spend 12 hours to submit
>> a log in the wrong format...
>>
>> TY
>> Dave WN4AFP