[PaQSO] CQ Log Checking Team/scoring team

Michael Coslo mjc5 at psu.edu
Tue Oct 9 12:27:02 EDT 2012


Try that technique I just posted explained with N1MM. You'll end up with two QSOs with one sent exchange and two separate counties in the Cabrillo logs. 

	- 73 de Mike N3LI -

On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Rob Nygren wrote:

> Hank,
>    I share your confusion. I tried for two hours last night to get N1MM to 
> accept a blank number or the same number in order to log a county line. Now 
> I'm a newbie at N1MM, but I had no luck.
>    With my old logger, (a highly personalized version of TRLog), I would go 
> in after the contest and edit in FRA/FUL. But looking at the template for 
> the New England QSO party, (as an example), 
> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/neqp.txt , that exchange is too long by 
> one character. If the sponsors are using a program to cross-check the logs, 
> the too long exchange could be considered invalid.
>    When you look at the Cabrillo log output, all the logging programs 
> should handle the county line stations the same way. But this close to the 
> weekend, I don't think I want to confuse myself any further.  Guess we'll 
> just to take our chances??



More information about the PaQSO mailing list