[PaQSO] CQ Log Checking Team/scoring team
Michael Coslo
mjc5 at psu.edu
Tue Oct 9 12:27:02 EDT 2012
Try that technique I just posted explained with N1MM. You'll end up with two QSOs with one sent exchange and two separate counties in the Cabrillo logs.
- 73 de Mike N3LI -
On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Rob Nygren wrote:
> Hank,
> I share your confusion. I tried for two hours last night to get N1MM to
> accept a blank number or the same number in order to log a county line. Now
> I'm a newbie at N1MM, but I had no luck.
> With my old logger, (a highly personalized version of TRLog), I would go
> in after the contest and edit in FRA/FUL. But looking at the template for
> the New England QSO party, (as an example),
> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/neqp.txt , that exchange is too long by
> one character. If the sponsors are using a program to cross-check the logs,
> the too long exchange could be considered invalid.
> When you look at the Cabrillo log output, all the logging programs
> should handle the county line stations the same way. But this close to the
> weekend, I don't think I want to confuse myself any further. Guess we'll
> just to take our chances??
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list