[PaQSO] Scoring question
Bob Rossi
807lover at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 13:47:26 EDT 2012
I still don’t understand why the mobile/rover total contest county/section
multiplier is used for each county a mobile/rover operates from.
Like Tom originally asked - “How can you work 53 counties and 57 sections
while only having 44 QSOs?”
The individual county score should only include those multipliers worked
from that county. After all, it’s the score for that county.
Sure, the total mobile/rover score should include all the multipliers.
If you look at some of the PaQP results from the mid 90s (when the rover
was first added), you will see individual rover county scores only included
multipliers worked from that county. That makes perfect sense to me.
And the overall total score includes all multipliers. And that makes
perfect sense to me.
For example, in the 1998 PaQP results, my rover operation scores looked
like this
NA2X/R – 3 Pa counties
CW80 CW SSB QSOs Cos Sec SCORE
CRN 0 0 264 264 52 23 20,500
ELK 0 0 176 176 43 20 11,588
WAR 130 62 112 304 56 28 39,960
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 130 62 552 744 65 32 89,885
All the rover and mobile scoring was done this way.
To me, somewhere along the line, something that made sense changed to
something that doesn’t make sense.
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list