[PaQSO] W3CG

Corey Dean N3FE n3fe at repeater.net
Tue Oct 7 13:36:30 EDT 2008


I Agree!

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, 2MRC wrote:

> SEEMS TO ME THAT CQ P vs CQ PAQSO IS ONLY 3 LETTERS, NOW THINKING THAT MOST
> WILL BE USING A COMPUTER GENERATED PROGRAM OF SOME SORT TO SEND THEIR CQ, ID AND
> OTHER INFO IT REALLY DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE TO ADD CONFUSION TOO.
>
> WAYNE,
> WS3PC
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Matthew Steger
> To: Peter Albright
> Cc: PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Tuesday, 07 October, 2008 09:55
> Subject: Re: [PaQSO] W3CG
>
>
> If you are working the PA QSO Party, I guess it makes sense but probably confuses the heck out of those not in the party.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Albright" <pcalbright at verizon.net>
> To: PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 6:34:06 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
> Subject: [PaQSO] W3CG
>
>
> KF3DJ (Ron) and I will have W3CG on the air from Erie County, 160 – 20, CW and SSB.
>
> One question: last weekend, I was warming up on the Californians and couldn’t help but notice how many of the CW stations were calling “CQ P de W6xxx”. Now, this “CQ P” makes a lot of sense to me. It saves a bunch of letters. Does it make sense to everyone, or is it confusing?”
>
> CU,
>
> Peter, AA2AD
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
>


More information about the PaQSO mailing list