[PaQSO] Discussion item
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Mon Dec 12 17:02:35 EST 2005
I know one shouldn't argue with the one who makes the rules and runs the
contest, but the rules as published for 2005 did not seem to allow a multi-multi
to enter as a rover, or at least did not allow M/Ms to be eligible for awards
as a rover. Says so under "Mobile & Rover Divisions" - "only single
transmitter entries eligible for awards".
However, it makes a lot more sense to let a portable operate multi-multi
than to call them a "Rover" when they never rove. Make the change you propose.
If you are examining rules in the Rover area, I'd urge you to allow rovers
to make qsos while mobile between stops.
I operated as both a rover and mobile in the 2003 and 2004 parties. Rover
is a great class... it only takes a small fixed antenna ( a 40 meter dipole up
20 feet at the center) to be loud enough to run lots of guys on SSB. This
is usually not possible as a mobile. With such a setup I passed out a lot of
qsos from places like ARM, BED, INN, FOR, JUN, SNY. A lot more than I could
have done with a seven foot mobile whip.
But presently a rover can't do anything while driving between stops. Very
boring, and it doesn't contribute much to the contest. Yes, in '03 and '04 I
actually did make qsos as a mobile between stops, but my efforts got divided
up between two scores.
You may want to include something to prevent a last minute conversion from
mobile to rover, such as a maximum of 22 counties (an average of one per hour)
as a rover. Or you could just keep the rules simple and trust people not to
abuse that possible loophole.
Thanks for your consideration,
Jim K8MR
Team (W3)USA 2005
K8MR/M & W3DAN/R 2004
K8MR/M & K8MR/R 2003
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list