[OKDXA] (no subject)

[Coy Day]

Mark,

I agree that the wording is ambiguous.  However, it is the wording that
all the states have had to use.  If you put too many specifics then the
bill won't pass with our amendment.  The FCC using this ambiguous wording
in PRB1 that has us in this fix.  Where you have to win the battle then is
in the city government.  For example the Dallas area hams convinced their
city council that 70ft was required.

Coy
--
Coy Day, N5OK
20685 SW 29
Union City, OK 73090
405-483-5632

K8fu at aol.com wrote:
> Coy..............................
>
> Tnx for the navigational instructions.................
>
> In reading this proposed legislation I pose the following questions:
>
> 1. In regards to CFR 47 is that referring to the PRB mandate from the  FCC
>  ??
>
> 2. It proposes antenna structure height sufficient to accommodate Amateur
> communication.......
>     That sounds ambiguous and very  subjective................... Is there
> anything definitive in this bill  regarding height or is each municipality
> free
> to determine amateur needs  ??  In this context I could envision a zoning
> board believing that a 30'  structure being adequate...............
>
> RIBBIT...............................RIBBIT.................................
>  BOHICA
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
> _______________________________________________
> OKDXA mailing list
> OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
>
>