[OKDXA] dual RX rigs

John Geiger (NE0P) ne0p at lcisp.com
Fri Feb 10 13:55:25 EST 2006


Hi David,

I agree with the benefits of dual receive.  Really miss having it right now, and was just wondering if most other found it necessary for DXing.

Any chance of having a sked on 40m as I need EL there still.  80 would be even better, but a little tougher also.  I am sure that other OKDXA members need it on one or both of those bands also.

73s John NE0P


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: SGTOKIE at aol.com
Reply-To: Discussion of OKDXA <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Date:  Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:22:50 EST

>john, i have 2 mark v(s) at home and i really liked it for tuning around to 
>see where dx stations were RX. 
>
>i liked the mark v so much that when i was in iraq i purchased another mark v 
>for iraq. i was also thinking how i wanted another one at home when i build 
>my dream shack plus it was harder for my wife to see exactially what i had 
>purchased.
>
>when i had the opportunity to be the DX station and many stations calling me 
>i would tune +/- away from the QRM and got some interesting contacts. 
>
>dual RX is a real advantage but im just speaking from a short time of 
>experience. there are many others out there that have worked 10,000s of more QSOs 
>than i have with a single RX and are much butter operators than i am
>
>73 and gud dx
>
>de david EL2RL, k5qwo, yi9qwo
>_______________________________________________
>OKDXA mailing list
>OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
>
 

________________________________________________________________



 
                   


More information about the OKDXA mailing list