[OKDXA] dual RX rigs
John Geiger (NE0P)
ne0p at lcisp.com
Fri Feb 10 13:55:25 EST 2006
Hi David,
I agree with the benefits of dual receive. Really miss having it right now, and was just wondering if most other found it necessary for DXing.
Any chance of having a sked on 40m as I need EL there still. 80 would be even better, but a little tougher also. I am sure that other OKDXA members need it on one or both of those bands also.
73s John NE0P
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: SGTOKIE at aol.com
Reply-To: Discussion of OKDXA <okdxa at mailman.qth.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:22:50 EST
>john, i have 2 mark v(s) at home and i really liked it for tuning around to
>see where dx stations were RX.
>
>i liked the mark v so much that when i was in iraq i purchased another mark v
>for iraq. i was also thinking how i wanted another one at home when i build
>my dream shack plus it was harder for my wife to see exactially what i had
>purchased.
>
>when i had the opportunity to be the DX station and many stations calling me
>i would tune +/- away from the QRM and got some interesting contacts.
>
>dual RX is a real advantage but im just speaking from a short time of
>experience. there are many others out there that have worked 10,000s of more QSOs
>than i have with a single RX and are much butter operators than i am
>
>73 and gud dx
>
>de david EL2RL, k5qwo, yi9qwo
>_______________________________________________
>OKDXA mailing list
>OKDXA at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/okdxa
>
________________________________________________________________
More information about the OKDXA
mailing list