[OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710

[MLandress]

The 7300 is HF and 6m. Software defined.  Color display, waterfall, latest
technology, Tuner built in. 

The 7100 is HF 6, 2 and 70cm Including DStar.  No tuner.  BW detachable
display, mobile or base.  This unit is going out of production but otherwise
serviceable.  Probably no firmware upgrades. 

Both can take various Icom compatible tuners.  

They are about the same price more or less.  These are not really in the
same class.  

Compare specs on the Icom website.  

From: ofarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:ofarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Jeff Greer
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 9:53 AM
To: Dominic Mazoch; ofarc at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710

 

The Icom IC-7300 does not do 2m/70cm.  It does 160-6m.

  _____  

From: ofarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net <ofarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on
behalf of Dominic Mazoch <domemt at juno.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 8:08 PM
To: ofarc at mailman.qth.net <ofarc at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [OFARC] Ic 7300 vs FT 710 

 

OK. which is better?

7300 does 2/.70M

710 seems to have better sound filtering?

Suggestions?


Dominic Mazoch
______________________________________________________________
OFARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ofarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:OFARC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to greerjw at hotmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/ofarc/attachments/20230713/f14f953c/attachment-0001.html>