[NLRS] Not much "contesting" here -- VHF Jan

[John Kalenowsky]

Oops - premature hit of send key...

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 1:25 PM John Kalenowsky <hamk9jk at gmail.com> wrote:

> The "raw score" calculation is a new feature of the web log uploader. It
> does exclude 'dupes' but does no cross-checking, the calculation is based
> ONLY on what is in the log and does not care about mode.
>
> For Bill's log, with January QSO point values:
> 6meter  --- 11 Qs 7 grids = 11 Qpts
>
2meter --- 11 Qs 7 grids = 11 Qpts

222 ---  7Qs 5 grids = 14 Qpts

432 ---  6Qs 5 grids = 12 Qpts

1296 --- 2Qs 2 grids = 8 Qpts

10GHz --- 1Q 1 grid = 8 Qpts


for a total of 64 Q points based on January point values. Is it possible
that there were some dupes in your log, Bill?

With June/September QSO point values, it would be 58 QSO points.

Neither values matches 61 or 68.

>From Jon's earlier log details and but changing to June/September QSO point
values, it would be:
Band   QSOs   Pts  Grd
   50      43        43   19
   144     16        16    5
   222       8        16    5
   902       2         6    2
 1296       1         3    1
 2304       1         4    1
 3456       1         4    1
 5760       1         4    1
  10G       1         4    1
  Total    74     100   36
for a score of 3600.  That's not 3200 so maybe there is something ELSE
going on?


> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 1:12 PM Jon Platt via NLRS <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I think the ARRL contest reporting system has an error in its score
>> reporting.  Perhaps its the points per band (?) as their reporter gave my
>> score as 3200 and N1MM (along with my hand math) said 4284.
>> Thanks for the Q's in the contest Bill.
>> 73, JonW0ZQ
>>
>
I helped debug an opportunity with how the web uploader's code was
calculating scores when it was first implemented so I'm willing to work on
that again but it would help to have some more details to try and address
what is going on.

73, JK