[NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.

[Andy Lokken]

I'll show up wherever the net goes whenever I can...  I didn't know it
had been decided and advertised, so I just threw it out there.
73
Andy K0AJL

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wouldn't think so either. If there happened to be a tremendous
> tropo opening or some need for microwavers to have a liaison frequency, I'm
> sure they'd work something out.
>
> What I usually do when using 2m liaison frequencies for microwave QSO's is
> ask the other station(s) to use 144.260 with a fallback to 144.200 or
> 144.270 if one frequency isn't available.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Matt Arthur <mattda at hickorytech.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi John,
>> I think scence the net is only on for an hour on Sunday night i really
>> don't
>> expect any problem.
>> Thanks for your input
>> 73 Matt ka0pqw
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <hamk9jk at ameritech.net>
>> To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
>>  Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Matt, Jon, others,
>> >
>> > I don't have a horse in this race as I don't check into the net...
>> >
>> > BUT, BEFORE the agreement to move to 144.260 is finalized and "in
>> > spite of" the SWOT history that Jon cited, might I remind that 144.260
>> > seems to be the "standing" (and nationwide?) liaison frequency on 2m
>> > SSB for GHz and up coordination/talkback.
>> >
>> > 144.240 "sounds better" to me BUT, as I noted, I don't have a horse in
>> > this race.
>> >
>> > Will there EVER be "conflict" if the net moves to 144.260? Likely not,
>> > or very minimal, but at least worthy of consideration before
>> > finalizing said decision.
>> >
>> > Anyone else have any comments or thoughts?
>> >
>> > 73, JK
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Matt Arthur" <mattda at hickorytech.net>
>> > To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>; <w0zq at aol.com>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:56
>> > Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hi Jon,
>> > >
>> > > 260 will work for me fine.
>> > >
>> > > I think we should let people know we will be mooving the net.
>> > >
>> > > some have memntioned the idea of buying the fire department a
>> > > scanner the
>> > > problem is i am really thinking that there is more then one of these
>> > > old
>> > > things out there.
>> > >
>> > > I sure as hell don't want to get in the buying new scanners for the
>> > > hole
>> > > town.
>> > > i am sure there at least two that are causing the problem.
>> > >
>> > > I think 260 will be fine.
>> > > i say lets make the change the first week in June.
>> > > this will give us time to inform people of the change.
>> > > Thanks 73 Matt ka0pqw
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: <w0zq at aol.com>
>> > > To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:26 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Hello Matt and all. As I recall, back in the "old days", the SWOT
>> > >> 2m group
>> > > used 144.260 for nets. In the spirit of continuation, I would
>> > > recommend
>> > > 144.260 over 144.240. In addition, I think other nets around the
>> > > country
>> > > also tend to use 144.260 .... perhaps for the same reason.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 73, Jon
>> > >>
>> > >> W0ZQ
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ______________________________________________________________
>> > >> NLRS mailing list
>> > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > >> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>> > >>
>> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> > >
>> > > ______________________________________________________________
>> > > NLRS mailing list
>> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > > Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>> > >
>> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > NLRS mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> NLRS mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>



-- 
_______________________________________
Andy Lokken