[NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.

[Zack Widup]

I wouldn't think so either. If there happened to be a tremendous
tropo opening or some need for microwavers to have a liaison frequency, I'm
sure they'd work something out.

What I usually do when using 2m liaison frequencies for microwave QSO's is
ask the other station(s) to use 144.260 with a fallback to 144.200 or
144.270 if one frequency isn't available.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Matt Arthur <mattda at hickorytech.net> wrote:

>
>
> Hi John,
> I think scence the net is only on for an hour on Sunday night i really
> don't
> expect any problem.
> Thanks for your input
> 73 Matt ka0pqw
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <hamk9jk at ameritech.net>
> To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
>  Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Matt, Jon, others,
> >
> > I don't have a horse in this race as I don't check into the net...
> >
> > BUT, BEFORE the agreement to move to 144.260 is finalized and "in
> > spite of" the SWOT history that Jon cited, might I remind that 144.260
> > seems to be the "standing" (and nationwide?) liaison frequency on 2m
> > SSB for GHz and up coordination/talkback.
> >
> > 144.240 "sounds better" to me BUT, as I noted, I don't have a horse in
> > this race.
> >
> > Will there EVER be "conflict" if the net moves to 144.260? Likely not,
> > or very minimal, but at least worthy of consideration before
> > finalizing said decision.
> >
> > Anyone else have any comments or thoughts?
> >
> > 73, JK
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matt Arthur" <mattda at hickorytech.net>
> > To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>; <w0zq at aol.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:56
> > Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jon,
> > >
> > > 260 will work for me fine.
> > >
> > > I think we should let people know we will be mooving the net.
> > >
> > > some have memntioned the idea of buying the fire department a
> > > scanner the
> > > problem is i am really thinking that there is more then one of these
> > > old
> > > things out there.
> > >
> > > I sure as hell don't want to get in the buying new scanners for the
> > > hole
> > > town.
> > > i am sure there at least two that are causing the problem.
> > >
> > > I think 260 will be fine.
> > > i say lets make the change the first week in June.
> > > this will give us time to inform people of the change.
> > > Thanks 73 Matt ka0pqw
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <w0zq at aol.com>
> > > To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:26 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [NLRS] Two meter net posible changing frequency.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hello Matt and all. As I recall, back in the "old days", the SWOT
> > >> 2m group
> > > used 144.260 for nets. In the spirit of continuation, I would
> > > recommend
> > > 144.260 over 144.240. In addition, I think other nets around the
> > > country
> > > also tend to use 144.260 .... perhaps for the same reason.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 73, Jon
> > >>
> > >> W0ZQ
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ______________________________________________________________
> > >> NLRS mailing list
> > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > >> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> > >>
> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > NLRS mailing list
> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > NLRS mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>