[NLRS] Re: [10GHzContest] IF radio power consumption
John P. Toscano
tosca005 at tc.umn.edu
Fri Sep 21 07:20:00 EDT 2007
W0ZQ at aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 9/20/2007 3:32:22 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> acepilot at bloomer.net writes: My 857 draws about 2 Amps when I have the output set to
> about 2W on 144 if I recall. I FOR SURE know it's not 22 Amps!
>
>
> Yup, ABOUT 1/2 amp just turning the FT-897 ON, then about another 1/2 amp
> pushing the PTT (one amp total), then ABOUT one more amp, two amps total, with
> a couple of watt out on 144 MHz. Current rises as output power rises.
Thanks VERY much for the information. It sounds like I have a good
target for a new IF radio for my 10 GHz system. I've not only been
thinking about how to lower the current consumption, I've been thinking
about how to redistribute the weight (less stuff behind the dish, and
better balanced). I guess I better go somewhere to play with the 857 and
897, to see if the ease of operating controls on the bigger 897 warrants
the size and weight penalty relative to the compact 857. OTOH, the
FT-897 looks like a handy radio for grab and go operation, so I'd
probably want to either not mount it on the dish at all, or at least
make it trivially easy to remove for operation below 10 GHz by itself,
on the (optional) internal batteries.
The FT-897D is also a little more than $100 more expensive than the
FT-857D, but if I am reading the specs correctly, the FT-897D has the
high stability TCXO built in, vs. being a nearly $100 option on the
FT-857D, making the prices much closer to one another. Both of the newer
D-suffix models have the DSP built in, as well has covering the 60 M band.
So many options, so little time...
73 de WØJT
More information about the NLRS
mailing list