[NLRS] [Fwd: [10gigs] K8EB MOVING UP A BIT --N4PZ BEACON RUNNING NON STOP ON CALL FREQ]

[Matt Burt]

Scott - good question but 10 gig a different kinda ball game...
Beaconers mostly always by the phone to switch to RX mode when heard.  QRM would
be a great problem to have!
All this traffic about RS is making me jealous ... better warm up my gear for
the weekend.
Good luck up North ... will be sure to look your way certainly from EN45 on
Sunday.

73,
Matt
KF0Q
(getting ready for the weekend)

Quoting Scott <acepilot at bloomer.net>:

> 
> 
> Looking at the subject line, it begs asking...Is it a good idea to 
> beacon on the calling frequency if the beacon is automatically 
> controlled and possibly unattended, even for 5 minutes?  I know it 
> sounds funny, but QRM on 10 GHz?  Starting to sound like HF ;)  
> Seriously, would calling CQ be better??  Newbies want to know :)  If QRM 
> is going to be a problem, I'll move down to 160 during the summer 
> instead of getting on 10 GHz ;)
> 
> Scott
> N0EDV
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[10gigs] K8EB MOVING UP A BIT --N4PZ BEACON RUNNING NON STOP 
> ON CALL FREQ
> Date: 	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: 	erwin beemer <mrdxcc at sbcglobal.net>
> Reply-To: 	NLRS Area 10GHz Operators Alert <10gigs at www.chris.org>
> To: 	10gig <10Gigs at www.chris.org>
> 
> 
> 
>   
> _______________________________________________
> https://www.chris.org/mailman/listinfo/10gigs
> 10Gigs mailing list
> 10Gigs at www.chris.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Scott
> http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/
> Gotta Fly or Gonna Die
> Building RV-4 (Super Slow Build Version)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>