[NLRS] June Log Submissions versus Cabrillo version 3 (was: Easy questions)

[John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK]

Todd,

It is my understanding, with the "uproar" about the "G"s being rejected, 
that the 'new and improved?' robot has been slightly lobotomized to 
accept WITH and WITHOUT "G" for bands above 1 GHz, even though "version 
3" now "requires" the "G". That is, both ways are acceptable to the 
robot for THIS past June, "1.2" OR "1.2G".

ALSO, last I checked, Bruce (WA7BNM) had NOT updated the web-to-cabrillo 
process to put the Gs in so it was a slight embarassment to the Contest 
Department that a process that they recommend for log submissions in 
'their' electronic format was getting rejects from the new robot. Bruce 
may very well have updated the web-to-cabrillo by now.

As far as the /1 for N4CW...I don't know.

Mike, WB8BZK, asked me the same thing...and I gave him the same 
NON-answer. I KNOW that MY log went in with just "N4CW" and I'm pretty 
sure Mike decided to go with "N4CW/1"...if that is ALL he or I get a 
"Newington Score Discount" for, I'll be happy. If anyone has an 
"authoritative" answer, I'd welcome it as well.

73, JK
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Overby" <goverby at charter.net>
To: <nlrs at mailman.qth.net>; <sprinkies at excel.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:48
Subject: Re: [NLRS] Easy questions


>
>
>> From glen  Tue Jul 10 10:45:33 2007
>> X-Original-To: nlrs at mailman.qth.net
>> Delivered-To: nlrs at mailman.qth.net
>
> Todd Sprinkmann asked:
>>   1)  Does the robot want to see "1.2" for 1296 contacts?
>
> 1.2G
>
> Cabrillo 3.0 is the spec it's now using: 
> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/
>
> If you're using roverlog, get the very latest version (released since 
> the
> contest) and it will convert your old log.
>
> Glen
> kc0iyt
> _______________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> NLRS at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs