[NLRS] Log format changes

[Andrew T. Flowers, K0SM]

Isn't there some ambiguity in the letter system when it comes to the 
mm-wave bands?  I seem to remember laser QSOs being "P" long ago, but 
now it should be "Q" because we have an extra allocation at 120 GHz.  If 
you specify by frequency/wavelength this isn't a problem.

Andy K0SM/2

Bill K0AWU wrote:

>  I find it interesting that the ARRL would make this log 
>format change and FORCE everyone to buy/upgrade 
>their logging software. This is software!! Why have 
>EVERYONE change when the ARRL could simply have 
>software that supports both formats... Very odd to an 
>"ole conservative" .... $$$$$ from everyone vrs what 
>should be a simple ARRL "adjustment" in house at little 
>if any real cost.
>
>  Sad ... I would hope that if I were at the ARRL meeting 
>that that decission was made, I would have said  "wait a 
>minute". But of course I was the one that told my school 
>administrator in a faculty meeting, that "we should NOT 
>allow sodapop machines in our school! That we were 
>promoting bad health." He told me then I should not 
>have coffee at school then. (I never did! I drink tea)
>
>Bill  K0AWU
>_______________________________________________
>NLRS mailing list
>NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
>
>
>
>  
>




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.22/238 - Release Date: 1/23/2006