[NLRS] question of transverters vs radios
Mike
Mike at kb0ozn.com
Mon Jan 9 16:48:03 EST 2006
Hi all, I'm looking for some discussion about the merits of using
radios I already have vs going with an sdr1000 and transverters.
Here's my situation. I have a 706mkIIG with no special filters or
features, a FT736R with just 144 and 440 and no special features and a
1.2GHz transverter by MM. Basically I have 6, 2, and .7 meters
covered with ssb and 23 cm if I ever get it hooked up. I was thinking
of buying a 222 MHz module for my 736r at a cost of $375 from ebay. A
similar transverter from DEM would be ~$400 but require alot more
effort to interface it.
I also have it in my mind that sometime soon I'd like to try an SDR
1000 out but that would require several transverters and cost just a
bit.
The easy thing to do is just get the 222 module plunk it in and presto
I have another band, albeit with no antenna up at the moment.
The best long term solution from a specs perspective seems to be the
sdr1000 route since it is technically very capable and the
transverters generally have a better nf and perhaps better
sensitivity. The biggest problem here is that I'd probably only be
able to afford to buy the sdr 1000 and one band for the moment.
What thoughts might ya'al have out there?
Thanks much
Mike
KBØozn
More information about the NLRS
mailing list