Fwd: Re: [NLRS] Bylaws Change!
Steven Huntsman
[email protected]
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:59:30 -0600
>Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:37:49 -0600
>To: [email protected]
>From: Steven Huntsman <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [NLRS] Bylaws Change!
>
>NLRS; to whoever cares,
>
>I suggest the 175 m. r. circle be slightly adjusted to include Fargo, ND,
>while keeping LaCross, WI if possible. The 1. membership conditions and 3.
>dues changes are fine with me. My 2 cents.
>
>Questions -- What if a Ham operator in La Crosse wants his/her score to be
>included with the Madison or Milwaukee, WI group? (Assuming there were
>such a group) Or what about a Ham in Eau Claire wanting to be included
>with a Green Bay radio group?
>Maybe the question should be; who gets to choose where the score goes, the
>section/area or the individual?
>Thanks and 73 de K0SDH
>
>At 12:41 PM 2/16/02 -0600, you wrote:
>>As mentioned earlier on the reflector, ARRL is changing some of the
>>rules concerning clubs and club competition eligibility. To take
>>advantage of those rules changes, we should make some minor changes to
>>the NLRS bylaws.
>>
>>If you want to go right to the proposed Bylaws change,
>>you can go directly to:
>> http://www.tc.umn.edu/~tosca005/NLRS-Dev/BylawsChange.htm
>>
>>73 de KB0ZEV
>>_______________________________________________
>>[email protected]